Cigarette Smoking and Quitting-Related Factors Among US Adult Health Center Patients with Serious Mental Illness

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: US adults with serious mental illness (SMI), compared to those without SMI, have a higher prevalence of smoking, which contributes to a shorter life expectancy. This study compared current smoking and quitting-related characteristics of low-income US adults with and without SMI who received healthcare at federally funded health centers. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from adults ≥ 18 years old in the nationally representative 2014 Health Center Patient Survey (n = 5592), we compared the prevalence of ever and current smoking among adults with and without SMI and calculated quit ratios as the percentage of ever smokers who have quit smoking. We examined the association between SMI and receiving advice to quit, making quit attempts, and having plans to quit in the next 30 days using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1376 (23%) of participants had SMI. Ever smoking prevalence was 68% in adults with SMI and 41% in adults without SMI, and current smoking prevalence was 48% and 22%, respectively. The quit ratio was 30% and 46% among participants with and without SMI, respectively. Compared to smokers without SMI, more smokers with SMI reported receiving advice to quit in the past 12 months (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.20-5.07). Smokers with and without SMI did not differ significantly in their odds of having made a past-12-month quit attempt or plans to quit. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers with SMI seen in federally funded health centers were just as likely to have made a quit attempt and to have plans to quit as smokers without SMI. Despite a higher likelihood of receiving clinician advice to quit, the lower quit ratio in this population suggests that advice alone is unlikely to be sufficient. These results underscore the need for augmented strategies to promote smoking cessation and reduce the excess burden of tobacco-related disease in patients with SMI. KEY WORDS: smoking cessation; mental health; vulnerable populations. J Gen Intern Med 34(6):986-91

Time trends in access to smoking cessation support for people with depression or severe mental illness: a cohort study in English primary care

“…Studies in the USA have similarly found higher rates of smoking cessation advice given to smokers with SMI. 28 The increase in advice to quit smoking given to non-SMI populations post 2012 in our study may be due to changes in incentivisation of recording of smoking advice in England. Before 2012, the QOF incentives scheme rewarded GPs for providing smoking cessation advice but this was only in relation to smokers with specific medical conditions, which included those with SMI (but not depression) from 2006.…”

A narrative review of lung cancer screening in underserved populations

“…While much of the lung cancer screening literature has focused on racial/ethnic and geographic inequities, there is an emerging interest in studying screening outcomes in other vulnerable patient groups, including the uninsured/Medicaid insured and sexual minorities (Table 4). The concern for LDCT screening disparities in these groups largely stems from previous studies demonstrating a disproportionately high prevalence of tobacco smoking and poor screening uptake for other cancer types in these cohorts (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44).…”

Prevalence of smoking, quit attempts and access to cessation treatment among adults with mental illness in Brazil: a cross-sectional analysis of a National Health Survey

“…11 In a nationally representative study of patients seen in federally funded health centres, US smokers with serious mental illness had higher smoking prevalence, lower quit ratios, but were just as likely to have made a past-month quit attempt, compared with smokers without mental illness. 42 Brazil has a national healthcare system that provides universal access to care, and a national smoking cessation treatment programme that provides free medication and counselling. 24 Tobacco treatment services, however, had uniformly low utilisation rates among tobacco users with and without mental illness.…”