Few studies have examined the association between passive smoking and the risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas. In a population-based case -control study with 2474 participants in Los Angeles County, there was no evidence that passive smoking had any appreciable effect on oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinomas. Tobacco smoking is a well-established cause of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) (IARC, 2004). Generally, the risk for both types of oesophageal cancer increases with increasing duration of smoking and remains high for a number of years after smoking cessation (IARC, 2004). The literature on smoking and stomach cancer also shows a consistent association with cigarette smoking in both men and women (IARC, 2004;Ladeiras-Lopes et al, 2008). Alcohol drinking is thought to be associated with ESCC (Freedman et al, 2007), but not with EA (Wu et al, 2001), and is not directly related to gastric cancer (Chow, 1999). Although much attention has been focused on the association between active smoking and cancer risk, less has been paid to the association between passive smoking and cancer risk, with the exception of lung cancer (IARC, 2004). A few studies have investigated gastric cancer in relation to passive smoking (Hirayama, 1984;Sandler et al, 1989;Nishino et al, 2001;Mao et al, 2002), but none has reported on EA.We investigated the relationship between passive smoking and the oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) risks in a population-based case -control study in Los Angeles County.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe details of the study population and design have been described elsewhere (Wu et al, 2001). Briefly, 1716 eligible patients with newly diagnosed first-incident EA, gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), or distal gastric adenocarcinoma (DGA) between 1992 and 1997 were identified and contacted for participation through the population-based, Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. Neighbourhood controls were matched individually to each case patient on sex, race, and age ( ± 5 years). To increase statistical power, we sought two controls for each case whenever possible. Inperson interviews were conducted using a structured questionnaire to gather information on demographics, smoking status, smoking history, and household passive smoking exposure during childhood and adulthood. Intensity of passive smoking exposure was measured by the number of smokers who smoked in the participant's presence for at least 1 year and the duration of each exposure. These smokers included the participant's spouse, parents, siblings, or other relatives. Next-of-kin (NOK) were interviewed when case patients were unable to be interviewed due to death or illness. However, we were unable to interview 769 patients who were too ill or died and had no NOK available for interview, whose physicians denied permission to contact, or who refused to participate or could not be located. After excluding participants due to missing information, a total of 938 (220 EA/277 GCA/441 ...