Cigarette and e-liquid demand and substitution in e-cigarette-naïve smokers.

Abstract

Behavioral economic methods allow experimental manipulation of price and examination of its effects on tobacco product purchasing. These methods may be used to examine tobacco product abuse liability and to prospectively model possible effects of price regulation. In the present study, we examined multiple measures of behavioral economic demand for cigarettes and e-liquid for use in a second-generation electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) in e-cigarette-naïve cigarette smokers. Twenty-five smokers received an e-cigarette (eGo ONE CT), sampled study e-liquid (24 mg/mL nicotine), and completed recurring sessions in which they used an experimental income to purchase real-world supplies of cigarettes and/or e-liquid. Participants also completed self-report measures of drug effects/liking. When products were available alone, we observed lower demand for e-liquid than for cigarettes. This effect was magnified when cigarettes and e-liquid were available concurrently. In additional assessments, e-liquid served as a partial substitute for cigarettes, but cigarettes did not serve as a substitute for e-liquid. Finally, participants rated e-liquid more poorly than cigarettes on several dimensions of drug effects/liking (any effects, liking, desire, and probability of continued use). We conclude that e-cigarette-naïve smokers value cigarettes more highly than e-liquid across multiple contexts and measurements. Nonetheless, participants still valued e-liquid positively and purchased it frequently, both as a substitute for cigarettes and independently of cigarettes. To understand the variables that influence transitions from exclusive smoking to either dual cigarette/e-cigarette use or exclusive e-cigarette use, future work should systematically examine the role of duration of e-liquid exposure. (PsycINFO Database Record

The Behavioral Economics of Alcohol Demand in French and American University Students

“…To date, much of the literature on behavioral economic interactions among drug reinforcers has examined demand for cigarettes and alternative nicotine products (Grace et al., ; Johnson et al., ; Stein et al., ), with some recent applications to cannabis (Amlung et al., ). For example, e‐cigarettes were found to substitute for real cigarettes in hypothetical and experimental purchase tasks administered to smokers (Grace et al., ; Johnson et al., ; Stein et al., ), and Amlung and colleagues () found that legal and illegal cannabis substituted for each other in a cannabis purchase task. These results regarding the behavioral economics of nicotine and cannabis indicate that demand for commonly used drugs can be decreased in the presence of lower‐priced alternatives.…”

A Pilot Study of E‐Cigarette Naïve Cigarette Smokers and the Effects on Craving After Acute Exposure to E‐Cigarettes in the Laboratory

“…Upon completion of this research, another report was published on e‐cigarette naïve individuals showing an asymmetric substitution pattern in which e‐liquid (24 mg/ml) served as a partial substitute for combustible cigarettes but not the reverse. Additionally, the participants in that study valued e‐liquid positively and purchased it frequently both as a substitute for and independently of combustible cigarettes …”

The impact of vaping and regulatory environment on cigarette demand: behavioral economic perspective across four countries

“…Elasticity estimates (non‐transformed means across vaping status groups ranged from 0.031 to 0.035 for daily smokers and 0.059 to 0.094 for non‐daily smokers) were comparable to prior studies , but testing demand in the context of other substitutable products provides a more realistic assessment of how consumers make product choices. Further study might apply methods that allow for the measurement of cross‐price elasticity, a direct test of product substitutability and a more robust test of the probable impact of having alternative products available to consumers at different price points .…”