Cicero, Clodia, and the Pro Caelio

Abstract

In his description of Cicero's eloquence Quintilian says that he had the power of carrying a jury with him against its better judgement without the jury's realizing what was happening. This magical power of Cicero's is exercised not only on Roman jurors, but also on most modern readers and even on some editors. This process is particularly apparent in many interpretations of the Pro Caelio. For example, Professor R. G. Austin, in his great edition of that speech, says, ‘Whatever the secret history, it is clear that the actual indictment was formal, and that Clodia was the real driving force behind it; society reasons prompted the case, and the issue was the social disappearance of either Clodia or Caelius.’ Yet an impartial weighing of the evidence with a mind unclouded by Cicero's brilliant oratory will point to the conclusion that the part played by Clodia in the case, though an important part, was only a subsidiary one.

El año de los cuatro emperadores. Confusión axiológica en las Historias de Tácito

“…52 Tacitus makes a similar judgement about Antonius Primus, and also other generals who helped the emperors of AD 69 along their way towards power, such as Fabius Valens. For Tacitus' treatment of these generals, see for example, DOREY (1958); MORGAN (1994aMORGAN ( ), (1997MORGAN ( ) and (2006MEULDER (1995); ASH (1999). 53 Tac.…”