2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3160433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CIA Drone Strikes in Pakistan: History, Perception and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drone strikes have not been limited to Afghanistan and it is believed that over 400 strikes occurred in the erstwhile FATA area (Yousaf, 2017: 8). The drone programme conducted by the CIA in both Afghanistan and Pakistan goes against the premise that use of force must be proportionate and discriminate.…”
Section: Strategies Of Us Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drone strikes have not been limited to Afghanistan and it is believed that over 400 strikes occurred in the erstwhile FATA area (Yousaf, 2017: 8). The drone programme conducted by the CIA in both Afghanistan and Pakistan goes against the premise that use of force must be proportionate and discriminate.…”
Section: Strategies Of Us Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drone programme conducted by the CIA in both Afghanistan and Pakistan goes against the premise that use of force must be proportionate and discriminate. The USA might defend such drone usage because the elimination of terrorists justifies the outcome and the remote operators have blanket authority to conduct such operations (Yousaf, 2017: 14). However, within the framework of the UN Charter, drone strikes are a violation of international law (Yousaf, 2017: 18), rendering such strategies questionable and disproportionate.…”
Section: Strategies Of Us Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%