2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chylomicronemia: Differences between familial chylomicronemia syndrome and multifactorial chylomicronemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
33

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
75
1
33
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the time course change of triglyceride levels were paralleled with an increased risk of complications, namely AP, which was found to be higher in FCS than in MCS. Also Paquette et al 40 have recently reported in a cross-sectional analysis that FCS patients have higher frequency of AP than MCS. However, because of the longitudinal nature of our study, we have been able to expand these findings estimating that FCS showed a 3-fold increased risk of incident AP events in comparison with MCS patients.…”
Section: Translational Sciences -Almentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The differences in the time course change of triglyceride levels were paralleled with an increased risk of complications, namely AP, which was found to be higher in FCS than in MCS. Also Paquette et al 40 have recently reported in a cross-sectional analysis that FCS patients have higher frequency of AP than MCS. However, because of the longitudinal nature of our study, we have been able to expand these findings estimating that FCS showed a 3-fold increased risk of incident AP events in comparison with MCS patients.…”
Section: Translational Sciences -Almentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Whilst occasional instances of ASCVD have been reported in FCS patients [22,23], these are considered exceptions that prove the rule. In contrast, other forms of severe HTG, such as multifactorial chylomicronemia or dysbetalipoproteinemia, appear to be associated with ASCVD [4,6,24].…”
Section: What Is the Clinical Presentation Of Fcs?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, a higher prevalence of metabolic abnormalities (elevated body mass index, high fasting glucose or high blood pressure) and ASCVD (prevalence of 17% in MCM vs 0% in FCS) were observed in the MCM group, whereas the FCS group had higher frequency of pancreatitis (prevalence of 60% in FCS vs 6% in MCM), multiple pancreatitis (prevalence of 48% in FCS vs 3% in MCM) and abdominal pain [6]. However, the mean triglycerides levels were similar between groups [6]. Whilst lifetime risk of pancreatitis is lower in MCM compared to FCS, the higher prevalence of MCM means that it underlies most cases of HTG-associated pancreatitis.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Causes Of Hypertriglyceridaemiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the relative risk is higher in monogenic chylomicronaemia, in absolute terms hyper-triglyceridaemia-induced pancreatitis is seen much more frequently with multifactorial or polygenic chylo-micronaemia. 48 Whatever the genetic basis, the severity of hypertriglyceridaemia (and thus propensity to develop pancreatitis) is increased by consumption of highfat foods, alcohol, oestrogen-containing medications, pregnancy, obesity and insulin resistance, diabetes, hypothyroidism, or medications that increase VLDL secretion (eg, steroids). 38 Because both parents will be obligate heterozygotes for any of these genes, screening of siblings of an affected child is obligatory; a quarter of siblings will also have biallelic or homozygous mutations.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The absence of secondary factors, and diagnosis at a very early age, are suggestive of monogenic chylomicronaemia, particularly if hypertriglyceridaemia is associated with pancreatitis. 48 Low plasma concentrations of plasma apolipoprotein B (<0·75 g/L) might help differentiate patients with monogenic versus multifactorial chylomicronaemia. 48 A history of severe hypertri glyceridaemia in a sibling also suggests a strong genetic basis for this disorder.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%