Abstract:Blowflies use their sense of smell to locate oviposition substrates and their vision to direct and assist in landing decision. Blowflies' ovipositions are usually aggregated. Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) females, for example, prefer to lay eggs on substrates containing fresh eggs of the same species. However, it is possible that females would be capable of evaluating the substrate, reducing the size of egg cluster in sites with a high amount of eggs or larvae, or finding another site for laying their eggs… Show more
“…The factors responsible for delays in oviposition have hardly been investigated in detail so far but are of great importance, as testing the validity of a key assumption, like the timely colonisation of a body, would lead to a better case specific estimation of the PMI (Tarone & Sanford, 2017). Some studies were performed to analyse relevant biotic factors like intra-and inter-specific competition (Denno & Cothran, 1976;Kotzé & Tomberlin, 2020;Prinkkila & Hanski, 1995), the previous presence of predator and prey larvae on the carrion (Brundage, 2012;Gião & Godoy, 2007), the presence of pheromones (Barton Browne et al, 1969;Lima & Von Zuben, 2016;Norris, 1965) but also physical barriers or other concealments (Bhadra et al, 2014;Charabidzé et al, 2015;Lutz, Moreau, et al, 2019;Scholl & Moffatt, 2017;Voss et al, 2008) and the habitat itself, for example, indoor or outdoor (Anderson, 2011;Cammack et al, 2016;Reibe & Madea, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies were performed to analyse relevant biotic factors like intra‐ and inter‐specific competition (Denno & Cothran, 1976; Kotzé & Tomberlin, 2020; Prinkkila & Hanski, 1995), the previous presence of predator and prey larvae on the carrion (Brundage, 2012; Gião & Godoy, 2007), the presence of pheromones (Barton Browne et al, 1969; Lima & Von Zuben, 2016; Norris, 1965) but also physical barriers or other concealments (Bhadra et al, 2014; Charabidzé et al, 2015; Lutz, Moreau, et al, 2019; Scholl & Moffatt, 2017; Voss et al, 2008) and the habitat itself, for example, indoor or outdoor (Anderson, 2011; Cammack et al, 2016; Reibe & Madea, 2010).…”
1. Locating an optimal oviposition site can be a challenging task for female insects, especially when dealing with a patchy, unpredictable and ephemeral food source such as carrion. Understanding the biotic and abiotic parameters that influence the oviposition behaviour of necrophagous flies is not just of great biological importance but also essential for their application in legal investigations.2. In this study, we monitored the oviposition activity of necrophagous flies (Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae) using mouse carcasses in an urban (city) and a rural (mixed forest) habitat in Frankfurt/Germany over a 2-year period.3. Over 240 sampling days, 220,963 larvae of 4 blow fly species and 1 flesh fly were sampled. The most abundant species was the blow fly Lucilia ampullacea, followed by its family members Calliphora vicina and Lucilia caesar, the flesh fly Sarcophaga caerulescens and Lucilia sericata. Up to seven environmental parameters were statistically significant predictors for a colonisation of the carcasses, leading to unique patterns of seasonal and daily oviposition activity for all five species. 4. Overall, the analysis showed that the seasonal adaption (the phenology of each species), the habitat (rural vs. urban) as well as temperature are the most important factors influencing the oviposition behaviour and activity of necrophagous blow flies and flesh flies.
“…The factors responsible for delays in oviposition have hardly been investigated in detail so far but are of great importance, as testing the validity of a key assumption, like the timely colonisation of a body, would lead to a better case specific estimation of the PMI (Tarone & Sanford, 2017). Some studies were performed to analyse relevant biotic factors like intra-and inter-specific competition (Denno & Cothran, 1976;Kotzé & Tomberlin, 2020;Prinkkila & Hanski, 1995), the previous presence of predator and prey larvae on the carrion (Brundage, 2012;Gião & Godoy, 2007), the presence of pheromones (Barton Browne et al, 1969;Lima & Von Zuben, 2016;Norris, 1965) but also physical barriers or other concealments (Bhadra et al, 2014;Charabidzé et al, 2015;Lutz, Moreau, et al, 2019;Scholl & Moffatt, 2017;Voss et al, 2008) and the habitat itself, for example, indoor or outdoor (Anderson, 2011;Cammack et al, 2016;Reibe & Madea, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies were performed to analyse relevant biotic factors like intra‐ and inter‐specific competition (Denno & Cothran, 1976; Kotzé & Tomberlin, 2020; Prinkkila & Hanski, 1995), the previous presence of predator and prey larvae on the carrion (Brundage, 2012; Gião & Godoy, 2007), the presence of pheromones (Barton Browne et al, 1969; Lima & Von Zuben, 2016; Norris, 1965) but also physical barriers or other concealments (Bhadra et al, 2014; Charabidzé et al, 2015; Lutz, Moreau, et al, 2019; Scholl & Moffatt, 2017; Voss et al, 2008) and the habitat itself, for example, indoor or outdoor (Anderson, 2011; Cammack et al, 2016; Reibe & Madea, 2010).…”
1. Locating an optimal oviposition site can be a challenging task for female insects, especially when dealing with a patchy, unpredictable and ephemeral food source such as carrion. Understanding the biotic and abiotic parameters that influence the oviposition behaviour of necrophagous flies is not just of great biological importance but also essential for their application in legal investigations.2. In this study, we monitored the oviposition activity of necrophagous flies (Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae) using mouse carcasses in an urban (city) and a rural (mixed forest) habitat in Frankfurt/Germany over a 2-year period.3. Over 240 sampling days, 220,963 larvae of 4 blow fly species and 1 flesh fly were sampled. The most abundant species was the blow fly Lucilia ampullacea, followed by its family members Calliphora vicina and Lucilia caesar, the flesh fly Sarcophaga caerulescens and Lucilia sericata. Up to seven environmental parameters were statistically significant predictors for a colonisation of the carcasses, leading to unique patterns of seasonal and daily oviposition activity for all five species. 4. Overall, the analysis showed that the seasonal adaption (the phenology of each species), the habitat (rural vs. urban) as well as temperature are the most important factors influencing the oviposition behaviour and activity of necrophagous blow flies and flesh flies.
“…Oviposition of the flies was induced by placing 50 grams of beef liver in gravid blowfly cages. The eggs were placed in 1-liter plastic jars filled with sawdust ( 20 ). After hatching, they were fed 300 grams of bovine liver.…”
Calliphoridae are widespread globally and can inhabit a variety of habitats. In this brief report, we assessed the appeal of Chrysomya rufifacies to resources that were previously inhabited by Lucilia sericata and L. cuprina, both common carrion colonizers. Two hundred adult male and female (1:1) C. rufifacies were released under controlled conditions into clear plastic cages (45 x 45 x 45 cm) with four types of substrates: beef-liver; liver with 100 third-instar larvae of L. cuprina; (III) liver containing 100 third-instar larvae of L. sericata; and liver containing 100 third-instar larvae of C. rufifacies. Each substrate was left in place for 24 hours at the end of a tube connected to the cage, where sticky traps were positioned to capture flies that might have been attracted to a specific substrate. The results indicate variations in the attraction of flies to different types of livers colonized by larvae of various species. It is suggested that flies may have specific preferences depending on the species of larvae present in the substrate. The liver without larvae was the preferred choice, while beef liver with C. rufifacies larvae was the least attractive. Results of statistical tests indicated that there is independence between attractiveness preference and the presence of C. rufifacies flies. Although there is a trend among certain levels of the variables in the correspondence analysis, these relationships are not statistically significant. However, they indicate specific patterns of association between different groups of flies and species of larvae. This study demonstrated that C. rufifacies does not show reduced attraction to any of the resources. A tetrahedron olfactometer device has been used for the first time in a behavioral study of C. rufifacies flies. This may enable future studies to enhance the understanding of fly behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.