2017
DOI: 10.1080/09291016.2017.1368215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronotype and time metaphors: morning-types conceive time as more friendly and less hostile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, procrastinators tended to be most alert and active during the evening hours, that is, during the time of day in which evening‐types reported optimal functioning (Fabbri et al., 2013c; May, 1999). Moreover, this result pattern could be discussed considering the association between morningness and a positive (friendly) attitude toward time, whereas eveningness was associated with negative (hostile) time and an elevated sense of rapid POT (Pruszczk et al., 2018). Thus, higher future scores in evening‐types could be related to their maladaptive judgment of future time; they may perceive it as hostile with a negative value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, procrastinators tended to be most alert and active during the evening hours, that is, during the time of day in which evening‐types reported optimal functioning (Fabbri et al., 2013c; May, 1999). Moreover, this result pattern could be discussed considering the association between morningness and a positive (friendly) attitude toward time, whereas eveningness was associated with negative (hostile) time and an elevated sense of rapid POT (Pruszczk et al., 2018). Thus, higher future scores in evening‐types could be related to their maladaptive judgment of future time; they may perceive it as hostile with a negative value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is possible to advance the idea that individuals with different temporal horizons could use different past‐present‐future temporal expression to locate themselves on the lifeline. Although the Time Metaphors Questionnaire was used to measure individual attitudes toward time, Pruszczk, Stolarski, and Jankowski (2018) found that morningness was associated with a more positive and friendly view of time, whereas eveningness was associated with a more negative and hostile view of time, with an elevated sense of the rapid passage of time, probably explaining the procrastination tendency in evening‐types (Díaz‐Morales et al., 2008; Digdon & Howell, 2008; Ferrari & Díaz‐Morales, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TP is different from approaches that capture specific important aspects as the subjective perception of time duration (Wittmann, 2013;Zakay & Block, 1997), different preferences for activity during mornings versus evenings, known as biological circadian-based rhythm (Pruszczak et al, 2017), and behavioral consequences of perceived time pressure (Svenson & Maule, 1993). In contrast, TP is conceptualized as a global construct (Stolarski et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Time Perspective Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronotyp wykazuje relacje z wieloma obszarami funkcjonowania psychicznego i społecznego, które to związki prawdopodobnie są dwukierunkowe, co oznacza, że nie tylko chronotyp wpływa na zachowanie, ale również podejmowana aktywność może oddziaływać na chronotyp. I tak osoby o chronotypach wieczornych częściej reagują złością (Jankowski, Linke, 2020), są mniej sumienne (Tsaousis, 2010), mają bardziej negatywny stosunek do upływu czasu (Pruszczak, Stolarski, Jankowski, 2018), częściej stosują środki psychoaktywne (Senyk, Jankowski, Cholii, 2020). Osoby wieczorne wykazują większy promiskuityzm (Randler, Jankowski, Rahafar, Díaz-Morales, 2016), którego nie można wytłumaczyć ich profilem osobowości (Díaz-Morales i in., 2019).…”
Section: Chronotypunclassified