2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronostratigraphy of the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in forearc basin fill on the Pacific side of central Japan: Constraints on the spatial distribution of an unconformity resulting from a widespread tectonic event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1a), the late Miocene sediments underwent clockwise rotation due to the Izu-Bonin Arc collision, which occurred after 4 Ma (Yoshida et al 1984). Moreover, the paleomagnetic record of Pliocene sediments during the Mammoth reversed polarity subchronozone in the Miura Peninsula shows a clockwise rotation of 28.4° (Utsunomiya et al 2017). Several paleomagnetic studies have implied that the collisions of the Izu-Bonin Arc affected the paleomagnetic directions of Miocene-Pleistocene sediments in the Boso and Miura Peninsulas.…”
Section: Magnetostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a), the late Miocene sediments underwent clockwise rotation due to the Izu-Bonin Arc collision, which occurred after 4 Ma (Yoshida et al 1984). Moreover, the paleomagnetic record of Pliocene sediments during the Mammoth reversed polarity subchronozone in the Miura Peninsula shows a clockwise rotation of 28.4° (Utsunomiya et al 2017). Several paleomagnetic studies have implied that the collisions of the Izu-Bonin Arc affected the paleomagnetic directions of Miocene-Pleistocene sediments in the Boso and Miura Peninsulas.…”
Section: Magnetostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No signi cant temporal gap corresponding to the Kurotaki unconformity has been identi ed in the Inubo Group, exposed on the Choshi Peninsula, based on biostratigraphy and tephrostratigraphy (Sakai, 1990;Tamura et al, 2014). Utsunomiya et al (2017) demonstrated that the uppermost parts of the Miura Group and the lowermost parts of the Kazusa Group on the Miura Peninsula are time-equivalent deposits, based on the lateral tracing of tephra beds. Gradual variations in the rate of sedimentation indicated that the Kazusa Group of the Miura Peninsula was deposited conformably on the Miura Group during 3.2-2.4 Ma, based on calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy.…”
Section: Forearc Basin Lls: the Miura And Kazusa Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on geochemical analysis of volcanic glass, Tamura et al (2015) suggested that the Wakebe tephra is correlative with deposits of a widespread tephra intercalated within the Kakegawa, Miura, and Inubo groups in central Japan (Tamura et al, 2014). Importantly, one of these deposits, the Ikg1 tephra (Tamura et al, 2014) in the upper Ikego Formation of the Miura Group, is present within a normal polarity magnetostratigraphic zone, which chronologically corresponds to Chron C2An.2n of the Gauss Chron (Utsunomiya et al, 2017;I. Tamura and M. Utsunomiya, personal communication, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%