1985
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death

Abstract: A new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death based upon chronological changes in the auricular surface of the ilium is presented. Formal stages have been constructed following extensive tests and refinements in observations made of such changes. Two completely "blind" tests were conducted to assess the accuracy and bias of the new method. Results show that the system is equally accurate to pubic symphyseal aging (although somewhat more difficult to apply), and also carries the advantages o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
1,042
3
98

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,597 publications
(1,229 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
18
1,042
3
98
Order By: Relevance
“…Age‐at‐death was estimated on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the pubic symphyses and auricular surfaces of the coxal bones (Brooks & Suchey, 1990; Lovejoy, Meindl, Pryzbeck, & Mensforth, 1985), the sternal ends of the ribs (İşcan & Loth, 1986; İşcan, Loth, & Wright, 1984), as well as late‐stage epiphyseal fusion in young adults (Scheuer & Black, 2000), and stages of cranial suture obliteration in older adults (Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985). Each adult skeleton was assigned to one of four age categories: 18–25 years (young adult), 26–35 years (early middle adult); 36–45 years (late middle adult) or ≥ 46 years (older adult) in accordance with the Museum of London Human Osteology Method Statement protocol (Powers, 2012) and agreed standard praxis in Irish osteoarchaeological research (Irish Association of Professional Osteoarchaeologists [IAPO], 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age‐at‐death was estimated on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the pubic symphyses and auricular surfaces of the coxal bones (Brooks & Suchey, 1990; Lovejoy, Meindl, Pryzbeck, & Mensforth, 1985), the sternal ends of the ribs (İşcan & Loth, 1986; İşcan, Loth, & Wright, 1984), as well as late‐stage epiphyseal fusion in young adults (Scheuer & Black, 2000), and stages of cranial suture obliteration in older adults (Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985). Each adult skeleton was assigned to one of four age categories: 18–25 years (young adult), 26–35 years (early middle adult); 36–45 years (late middle adult) or ≥ 46 years (older adult) in accordance with the Museum of London Human Osteology Method Statement protocol (Powers, 2012) and agreed standard praxis in Irish osteoarchaeological research (Irish Association of Professional Osteoarchaeologists [IAPO], 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age and sex estimation results, presented at a conference in 2014 (Kjellström, 2016), were based on osteological standard methods for morphologic indicators (Buikstra & Ubelaker, 1994) (S2–S3). The epiphyseal union was completed on all preserved bones, and the appearance of the auricular surface of the left hip bone meets the morphologic criteria for phase 3 according to methods by Lovejoy, Meindl, Mensforth, and Pryzbeck (1985) and Meindl and Owen (1989). Furthermore, the dental wear of the lower molars was clear but moderate (stage 2–4) (Brothwell, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely to be explained by different funerary customs for infants and children, as has also been observed in other Ancient Egyptian and Nubian cemeteries (Buzon, 2006;Zillhardt, 2009 (Bruzek, 2002; Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994). Age estimation was based on degeneration of the pubic symphysis (Brooks and Suchey, 1990) and auricular surface (Lovejoy et al, 1985). Pathological conditions were assessed macroscopically and through the use of a hand lens (10x magnification) (Ortner, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%