2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronological histological findings of cultured epidermal autograft over bilayer artificial dermis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the culture process, keratinocytes and fibroblasts synthesize dermal-epidermal junction proteins on either a plastic or fibrin matrix. The use of a fibrin matrix presents the advantage of conserving these proteins [22], which are otherwise cleaved by enzymatic treatment during CEA detachment from the culture vessel [50], as confirmed in our study (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…During the culture process, keratinocytes and fibroblasts synthesize dermal-epidermal junction proteins on either a plastic or fibrin matrix. The use of a fibrin matrix presents the advantage of conserving these proteins [22], which are otherwise cleaved by enzymatic treatment during CEA detachment from the culture vessel [50], as confirmed in our study (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In a variant of the original procedure cultured epithelial autografts (rather than disaggregated KC) were grafted onto DRT. Although newly synthesized epidermis and dermis showed almost normal histological appearance, formation of BM proteins was delayed; however, at a later time of observation, the newly synthesized skin was very durable and the two tissue layers could not be separated (stripped) even though they still lacked certain BM proteins (Matsumura et al 2013). …”
Section: Fig 58mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we showed that the use of both fibrin matrices allowed the deposition and the preservation of Laminin 332, Collagen IV, and Perlecan, whereas none of these proteins were present on epidermal substitutes with no matrix after dispase detachment at the time of grafting (Figure d). The enzymatic step is not solely causing the absence of these proteins as only Laminin 332 and Perlecan were expressed at a low level in epidermal substitutes before enzymatic treatment (Figure a; Matsumura, Gondo, Imai, Shibata, & Watanabe, ). Moreover, hPBM‐ and FPF‐released factors slightly enhanced Laminin 332 and Perlecan in epidermal substitutes with no matrix (Figure d‐f).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%