“…Zaragosi et al, 2001). N. pachyderma percentages, coarse lithic grain concentrations CLG, magnetic susceptibility of bulk sediment (U em ; Grousset et al, 2000), and number of laminae are compiled with relative abundances of the main dinocyst species, percentages of C37:4 among C37 alkenones (red, Ménot et al, 2006) Composite Relative Sea Level (RSL) curve (Lambeck et al, 2014) with identified K-MWP at 19 ka BP and MWP-1A at ~14.6 ka BP, July Insolation curve at 65°N (Berger and Loutre, 1991), δ 18 O NGRIP record (GICCO05; Svensson et al, 2008), 231 Pa/ 230 Th signal (Ng et al, 2018), N. pachyderma percentages (blue, this study; red dotted line for the core MD95-2002 (Zaragosi et al, 2001)), H/A ratio (blue, this study; and reversed for comparison along the 231 Pa/ 230 Th signal), Runoff events (R) 4 and 5 (core MD95-2002, Toucanne et al, 2015, L. machaerophorum versus O. centrocarpum (Lmac/Ocen ratio, This study), L. machaerophorum versus I. minutum (Lmac/Imin ratio, This study), dinocyst-derived seasurface seasonality (SSTsummer-SSTwinter) and three-point moving average of Xerophyte and Mediterranean forest percentages from southern Spain (Camuera et al, 2021) as well as temperate forest percentages from the Alboran Sea (Fletcher and Sanchez Goñi, 2008). The proposed comparison respects dating uncertainties and strong reservoir age impacts at that time may be responsible for generating temporal offsets between records.…”