2016
DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2016.44013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronically Evaluated Highest Instantaneous Priority Next: A Novel Algorithm for Processor Scheduling

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel chronically evaluated highest instantaneous priority next processor scheduling algorithm. The currently existing algorithms like first come first serve, shortest job first, round-robin, shortest remaining time first, highest response ratio next and varying response ratio priority algorithm have some problems associated with them. Some of them can lead to endless waiting or starvation and some of them like round-robin has problem of too many context switches and high waiting time ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifying the time slice at the beginning of each round is another dynamic version of SRR proposed by Lipika [24], in which the time slice is calculated with respect to the residual burst times (RBT) in the successive rounds. Lipika benefited from SJF in which the processes are ordered increasingly based on their burst times (i.e., the process with the highest burst time will be at the tail of the ready queue and the process with the lowest burst time will be at the head of the queue) [25][26][27]. Adaptive80 RR is a dynamic variant of SRR proposed by Christoph and Jeonghw [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the time slice at the beginning of each round is another dynamic version of SRR proposed by Lipika [24], in which the time slice is calculated with respect to the residual burst times (RBT) in the successive rounds. Lipika benefited from SJF in which the processes are ordered increasingly based on their burst times (i.e., the process with the highest burst time will be at the tail of the ready queue and the process with the lowest burst time will be at the head of the queue) [25][26][27]. Adaptive80 RR is a dynamic variant of SRR proposed by Christoph and Jeonghw [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time slice is calculated depending on the remaining burst times in the subsequent rounds. In addition, the author also implemented SJF [35][36][37]. In SJF, the processes located in the ready queue are sorted in increasing order based on their burst times (i.e., the process having lowest burst time will be at the front of the ready queue and process having highest burst time will be at the end of the ready queue).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method calculates the time slice concerning the residual burst times (RBT) in the successive cycles. The shortest job first will benefit the processes which are sequenced increasingly based on their burst times (i.e., the process with the highest burst time will be at the tail of the ready queue, and the process with the lowest burst time will be at the head of the row) [25]. The present study used preemptive priority scheduling to provide service to emergency patients according to their priority and severity levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%