2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13181-015-0480-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Treatment with Naltrexone Prevents Memory Retention Deficits in Rats Poisoned with the Sarin Analog Diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and Treated with Atropine and Pralidoxime

Abstract: Humans and rats poisoned with sarin develop chronic neurological disabilities that are not prevented with standardized antidotal therapy. We hypothesized that rats poisoned with the sarin analogue diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and resuscitated with atropine and pralidoxime would have long-term memory deficits that were preventable with naltrexone treatment. Long Evans rats (250-275 g) were randomized to: DFP (N=8): single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DFP (5 mg/kg). Treatment (N=9): DFP (5 mg/kg) followed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these MWM studies did pre-exposure baseline tests as we did in this study. It is plausible that the prior learning may have impacted the learning and memory at 10–16 and 28–34 days post-exposure in this study in contrast to the published literature (Brewer et al, 2015, 2013; Prendergast et al, 1997). On an off note, the animals in our study were also subjected to other behavioral tests which may have interfered with MWM performance or vice versa.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of these MWM studies did pre-exposure baseline tests as we did in this study. It is plausible that the prior learning may have impacted the learning and memory at 10–16 and 28–34 days post-exposure in this study in contrast to the published literature (Brewer et al, 2015, 2013; Prendergast et al, 1997). On an off note, the animals in our study were also subjected to other behavioral tests which may have interfered with MWM performance or vice versa.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In this study, even though we observed increased epileptiform activity, intensely stained S-100β in reactive astrocytes, proinflammatory cytokines, and hippocampal neurodegeneration, we did not observe significant differences in learning and short-term memory in the MWM when the animals were tested between 10–16 and 28–34 days post- exposure. Previous studies reported the impact of acute exposure of DFP on cognition in the MWM only after 4 or 12 weeks of exposure (Brewer et al, 2015, 2013). In a chronic exposure DFP study, 35 days after the first DFP exposure affected spatial learning (Prendergast et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment groups and the respective administered agents are depicted in Table 1 . Doses of DFP and SOC were selected based on the literature 9 , 27 29 . DFP was administered at 3 mg/kg as single, intravenous bolus dose to simulate an acutely toxic one-time exposure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphine-induced impairment may be the result of the effect of mu-opioid receptors, because the action of opioids might be inhibited by mu-opioid receptor antagonists (12). Lately, studies working on the impact of administration of opioid antagonists, such as naloxone and naltrexone, on memory expansion in lab animals have been performed (13,14). memory seems to be the result of augmenting GluA1-S845 phosphorylation-dependent AMPAR trafficking (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%