1986
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(86)90109-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study on acrylamide incorporated in the drinking water of Fischer 344 rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
300
1
15

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
300
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Adding to the complexity, the mode of exposure between animals and humans differs, and we currently do not know about the bioavailability of acrylamide in foods. While evidence from animal 11,19 and risk assessment models 6,28 suggests a small increase in risk in humans, risk assessment models have generally assumed a linear dose-response relation at low levels of exposure, 29 but this is not known for certain. The level of uncertainty in these models is indeed substantial, being an 8-to 9-fold difference in potential risk due to a range from a relative risk of Incidence rate per 100,000 person-years.-2 Data adjusted for age at screening.-3 Data adjusted for age at screening, body mass index, education, alcohol intake, energy intake, saturated fat intake and fiber intake.- 4 Reference category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Adding to the complexity, the mode of exposure between animals and humans differs, and we currently do not know about the bioavailability of acrylamide in foods. While evidence from animal 11,19 and risk assessment models 6,28 suggests a small increase in risk in humans, risk assessment models have generally assumed a linear dose-response relation at low levels of exposure, 29 but this is not known for certain. The level of uncertainty in these models is indeed substantial, being an 8-to 9-fold difference in potential risk due to a range from a relative risk of Incidence rate per 100,000 person-years.-2 Data adjusted for age at screening.-3 Data adjusted for age at screening, body mass index, education, alcohol intake, energy intake, saturated fat intake and fiber intake.- 4 Reference category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals exposed to very high levels of acrylamide have shown an increased incidence of cancer in the lung, mammary gland, oral cavity and intestinal and reproductive tract. 11 Only 4 epidemiologic studies to date have explored whether exposure to acrylamide through diet could increase the risk of human cancer. [12][13][14][15][16] The evidence from these studies was converging, showing that intake of dietary acrylamide was not associated with an increased risk of several cancers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant DNA adduct of N7-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)-guanine (N7-GA-Gua) is formed in all tested organs at 100-fold higher levels than is N3-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)-adenine (N3-GA-Ade) (Gamboa da Costa et al, 2003). Increased incidences in a number of benign and malignant tumors in a variety of organs have been observed in rodents exposed to AA (Bull et al, 1984;Friedman et al, 1995;Johnson et al, 1986;Rice, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported recently that fried carbohydrate-rich food (e.g., French fries and potato chips) are a major source of human dietary AA intake (Tareke et al, 2000(Tareke et al, , 2002. These findings arose worldwide concern, since it was previously well established that AA is toxic to the human nervous system (Bachmann et al, 1992;Tilson, 1981), and likewise it was determined that neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and tumorigenicity in laboratory animals manifested after AA exposure (Dearfield et al, 1988;Johnson et al, 1986). Further, it has been reported that AA can cause pathological alterations in the brain and spinal cord in rats leading to neurobehavioral modifications (LoPachin and Gavin, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that carcinogenicity was previously observed as a result of 2.0 mg/kg/day AA exposure in the 2-year Fischer 344 rat bioassay has strongly suggested the public health importance of further studying exposure to AA. In particular, AA exposure resulted in increased tumor incidence in the mammary gland, central nervous system, thyroid gland-follicular epithelium, oral tissues, uterus, and clitoral gland in female rats, as well as tumors of thyroid gland-follicular epithelium and scrotal mesothelium in male rats compared to control animals (Johnson et al, 1986). More recent carcinogenicity studies have demonstrated Harderian gland adenoma, alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma of the lung, squamous cell neoplasms of the forestomach in both male and female B6C3F 1 mice exposed to 0.175 mM or higher AA concentrations (Beland et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%