Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic stroke survivors achieve comparable outcomes following virtual task specific repetitive training guided by a wearable robotic orthosis (UL-EXO7) and actual task specific repetitive training guided by a physical therapist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, rehabilitation robots like the exoskeleton system shown in Fig. 1 have been developed to automate the training process by providing controllable and repetitive motion [4], [5]. Surprisingly, although resistance controllers have been reported in manipulandalike training devices, no robotic exoskeleton has this feature available [6].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, rehabilitation robots like the exoskeleton system shown in Fig. 1 have been developed to automate the training process by providing controllable and repetitive motion [4], [5]. Surprisingly, although resistance controllers have been reported in manipulandalike training devices, no robotic exoskeleton has this feature available [6].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although protocols of some studies included in the review by Laver et al [48] allowed the inclusion of those with more severe UL deficits, in many cases it is not possible to ascertain the severity of those who actually participated and as such, the effectiveness with those with more severe deficits is unclear. Moreover, many studies inclusive of participants with moderate to severe UL impairments, have also employed the use of robotics or physical assistance from therapists in addition to VR, suggesting issues of feasibility of the systems when used alone and limited feasibility in the community [49,50,51,52]. While critical to exercise-adherence, few studies have considered patient evaluation of VR devices and when such evaluation has been performed, there has often been a lack of analytical rigour [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies were conducted with mildly to moderately affected patients. In the remaining patient group with moderate to severe upper limp impairment, the intervention effects were more heterogeneous and affected by the impairment level, with either no or only modest additional gains in comparison to dose-matched conventional treatments (Housman et al, 2009; Byl et al, 2013; Subramanian et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%