2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11882-018-0792-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Children: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Medical Management

Abstract: Chronic rhinosinusitis as a diagnosis is a conglomeration of multiple phenotypes and endotypes. As such, the diagnosis and management are complex. New survey studies provide some consensus on prevalence and management of this disease in children. In this review, we highlight the differential diagnosis of pediatric CRS, including non-eosinophilic/infectious variants, eosinophilic variants with and without nasal polyps, allergic fungal sinusitis, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, primary immunodeficiency,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
22

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
42
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviews and consensus statements on diagnostic modalities are recently summarized by Heath et al [4] and Chandy et al [12]. An otolaryngology focused consensus statement was published in 2014 [15].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reviews and consensus statements on diagnostic modalities are recently summarized by Heath et al [4] and Chandy et al [12]. An otolaryngology focused consensus statement was published in 2014 [15].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These manuscripts provide perspective on the diagnostic modalities in chronic rhinosinusitis in children; however, the radiology issues, limitations, radiation effects, and cost have been a constant theme for years [4,12,15,16]. The reviews do not support use of standard radiography of paranasal sinuses in children (Waters view) due to sensitivity and specificity issues (as compared to computerized tomography (CT)) [4,12,15], or the confusion of plain films with upper respiratory tract infection edema [12]. Plain radiography (waters view only) has limitations of sensitivity and specificity (as compared to CT) [16], and further details of the history of sinus radiological assessment has been reviewed [10].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the PCRS definition states, CT is the gold standard for imaging when establishing a PCRS diagnosis or preparing for sinus surgery, particularly a non-contrasted CT with axial, coronal, and sagittal views. The sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs, such as a lateral soft tissue neck X-ray evaluating the adenoids, are limited in evaluating the patient’s need for adenoidectomy [10,11]. According to the AAO-HNS consensus on appropriate use of CT imaging, it is recommended in patients with PCRS when medical management and/or adenoidectomy have failed to control symptoms [11].…”
Section: Disease Presentation/diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%