2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Reboxetine Desensitizes Terminal but not Somatodendritic α2-Adrenoceptors Controlling Noradrenaline Release in the Rat Dorsal Hippocampus

Abstract: The slow onset of antidepressant drugs' effects is thought to reflect the time required for the development of adaptive changes such as desensitization of presynaptic autoreceptors controlling the release of neurotransmitters. Using in vivo microdialysis in conscious rats, we studied the effect of a continuous infusion of the selective noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor reboxetine on extracellular concentrations of NA. Doses of 10 mg/kg/day reboxetine through subcutaneous osmotic pumps for 2 days increased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of chronic NET blockade on NE signaling may differ between forebrain and brainstem regions. In support of this hypothesis, the decrease in b 1 -adrenergic receptors observed after chronic DMI treatment was much more evident in the cortex compared to subcortical regions (Bergstrom and Kellar, 1979), and a 2 -adrenergic receptor desensitization after chronic reboxetine was observed in the hippocampus but not the LC (Parini et al, 2005). Our results suggest that the compensatory downregulation of NE signaling may preferentially occur in the forebrain.…”
Section: Chronic Net Inactivation Has Both Proconvulsant and Anticonvsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The effects of chronic NET blockade on NE signaling may differ between forebrain and brainstem regions. In support of this hypothesis, the decrease in b 1 -adrenergic receptors observed after chronic DMI treatment was much more evident in the cortex compared to subcortical regions (Bergstrom and Kellar, 1979), and a 2 -adrenergic receptor desensitization after chronic reboxetine was observed in the hippocampus but not the LC (Parini et al, 2005). Our results suggest that the compensatory downregulation of NE signaling may preferentially occur in the forebrain.…”
Section: Chronic Net Inactivation Has Both Proconvulsant and Anticonvsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although arrestins are present in both (64), the postsynaptic compartment contains another player, spinophilin (65,66), which has been shown to functionally antagonize arrestin actions at the ␣ 2A AR (49). Herein lies a potential explanation for previous evidence of differential regulation of terminal versus somatodendritic ␣ 2A AR expression by chronic antidepressant (28,63,67). As well, although heteroreceptors have certainly been implicated in the antidepressant response (18, 68), we have not been able to examine ␣ 2A autoreceptors specifically, which remains a goal of future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A mechanistic explanation for this phenomenon has been lacking, although it has been postulated to result from the actions of elevated NE levels in the brain. Experimental evidence suggests that synaptic concentrations of NE are basally around 1 nM, and approach 10 nM following treatment with reuptake inhibitors (28,57,63). However, the ability of such a physiological concentration of NE to affect receptor expression has not been shown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even at the highest dose of DOV 102,677 tested, DA levels in the prefrontal cortex were 80% higher than those of 5-HT, while in the n. accumbens, the overall levels were lower and more equivalent. This suggests that DOV 102,677 may exert preferential effects on neurotransmitter levels in the prefrontal cortex, due in part to differences in transporter populations (low densities of DAT and a higher affinity of DA for the NET compared to NE), (Tanda et al, 1997;Moron et al, 2002), and possibly, interactions with presynaptic receptors to modulate neurotransmitter release (Garris et al, 2003;Parini et al, 2005). The regional differences in potency of DOV 102,677 in elevating neurotransmitter levels indicate that DOV 102,677 may also have different clinical indications, depending on dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%