2007
DOI: 10.1159/000098064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Role of Alpha Blocker Therapy

Abstract: Introduction: This article reviews the rationale and data supporting alpha blocker therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), the most common and difficult prostatitis syndrome. Methods: Systematic review identified ten clinical trials evaluating alpha blocker therapy for patients with CP/CPPS, including five open-label or small prospective studies and five double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trials. Results: Encouraging results in uncontrolled and small clinical trials … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total NIH-CPSI score ranged from 0 to 43, with a total score of 0 to 10 for urinary symptoms, 0 to 21 for pain or discomfort, and 0 to 12 for quality of life, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Efficacy determination: Healed: > 90% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Significantly valid: 60–89% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Valid: 30–59% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Invalid: <30% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment [ 9 ]. The total effective rate was calculated as healed rate + significantly valid rate + valid rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total NIH-CPSI score ranged from 0 to 43, with a total score of 0 to 10 for urinary symptoms, 0 to 21 for pain or discomfort, and 0 to 12 for quality of life, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Efficacy determination: Healed: > 90% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Significantly valid: 60–89% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Valid: 30–59% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment; Invalid: <30% reduction in total NIH-CPSI score after treatment [ 9 ]. The total effective rate was calculated as healed rate + significantly valid rate + valid rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, as smooth muscle contraction in the bladder and prostate mediated by a 1adrenoceptors has been proposed as a possible etiology for CP/CPPS, there may be a role for a 1 -blockers in the treatment of this entity [Nickel, 2008]. A recent systematic review identified 10 clinical trials evaluating a 1 -blocker therapy for men with CP/CPPS [Lee et al 2007]. Encouraging results in five uncontrolled, openlabel, and small prospective clinical trials, led to the development of five reasonably-powered, Therapeutic Advances in Urology 1 (4) double-blinded, placebo controlled, randomized trials evaluating terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Treatment In Men With Nocturia and Pelvic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a recent study found that 69.3% of community-dwelling men experienced moderate-to-severe symptoms on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in Hong Kong ( Yee et al, 2014 ). Without proper treatment, LUTS can present with complications, such as acute urinary retention (AUR), urinary tract infections, or sometimes obstructive uropathy ( Lee et al, 2007 ; McVary et al, 2011 ). In the current era of an increased life expectancy and the aging of baby boomer generation, male LUTS would become an issue of increasing socioeconomic and medical importance ( Lee et al, 2008 ; Kaplan et al, 2015 ; Lee et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%