2021
DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1859709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study in Japanese population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain catastrophizing describes an amplified emotional and cognitive response to pain 23,24 , and is a stronger predictor of pain intensity in urgent care settings than vital signs 25,26 . In addition to pain catastrophizing, presurgical opioid use 27,28 , severe presurgical pain intensity [29][30][31] , and patients' outcome expectations 32 are modifiable factors associated with postsurgical outcomes. Given the mixed results of biomedical interventions (e.g., procedures and analgesic drug prescriptions) in reducing the risk of unresolved chronic pain 21,33 , assessment and evaluation of modifiable biopsychosocial factors provides one avenue for improving patient-centered interventions and postsurgical outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain catastrophizing describes an amplified emotional and cognitive response to pain 23,24 , and is a stronger predictor of pain intensity in urgent care settings than vital signs 25,26 . In addition to pain catastrophizing, presurgical opioid use 27,28 , severe presurgical pain intensity [29][30][31] , and patients' outcome expectations 32 are modifiable factors associated with postsurgical outcomes. Given the mixed results of biomedical interventions (e.g., procedures and analgesic drug prescriptions) in reducing the risk of unresolved chronic pain 21,33 , assessment and evaluation of modifiable biopsychosocial factors provides one avenue for improving patient-centered interventions and postsurgical outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TKA surgery has been regarded as a successful treatment option for restoring function and for alleviating pain in the treatment of knee joint disease, approximately 20% of these cases have little or no improvement in physical function, pain and quality of life 20,21 . Many risk factors, such as the female sex, age, alcohol use, smoking, pre‐existing psychiatric illness and the African‐American race, are associated with increased persistent pain and increased patient dissatisfaction after TKA 22,23 . Among these risk factors, precise bone resection and accurate component positioning are important for preventing the malalignment of TKA 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Many risk factors, such as the female sex, age, alcohol use, smoking, pre-existing psychiatric illness and the African-American race, are associated with increased persistent pain and increased patient dissatisfaction after TKA. 22,23 Among these risk factors, precise bone resection and accurate component positioning are important for preventing the malalignment of TKA. 24,25 Inadequate bone resection may cause suboptimal component positioning, thus leading to malalignment, which can result in an increased rate of revision arthroplasty and polyethylene wear.…”
Section: F I G U R E 4 Typical Picture Of Sawbones After Bone Resection: (A) Femoral; (B) Tibialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this study aimed to analyze factors associated with PPSP (from both prospective and retrospective studies), an alternative method for the ROB systematic assessment was applied based on the methodology used in other systematic reviews focusing on the analysis of predicting factors. 53,56,116 Potential sources of bias were evaluated and addressed whether (1) the sample adequately represented the population of interest, (2) the data represented the sample, and (3) the outcome of interest was adequately measured to limit potential bias (Appendix 2, available at http://links.lww.com/ PR9/A184). Other potential serious sources of bias were documented-eg, selective reporting of outcomes, use of nonvalidated scales, or lack or inappropriateness of sample size calculation.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%