2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(11)62628-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Noncancer Pain Rehabilitation With Opioid Withdrawal: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Based on Opioid Use Status at Admission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…People randomised to the taper support group had a 1.0 point reduction on a 0-10 pain scale compared with baseline, while those randomised to usual care had a 0.5 point reduction. This finding is consistent with other studies where opioid tapering was shown to result in reduced rather than increased pain 1920…”
Section: What Is the Evidence Of Uncertainty?supporting
confidence: 93%
“…People randomised to the taper support group had a 1.0 point reduction on a 0-10 pain scale compared with baseline, while those randomised to usual care had a 0.5 point reduction. This finding is consistent with other studies where opioid tapering was shown to result in reduced rather than increased pain 1920…”
Section: What Is the Evidence Of Uncertainty?supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Importantly, these benefits appear to be sustained over time. Similar treatment outcomes have been collaborated by other published results of pain rehabilitation programs [20,22,43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The standardized subscale has a mean of 50 (range 0 to 100) and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain severity. This standardized measure of clinical pain has been used extensively to assess the outcomes of patients admitted to our pain treatment program [12, 31, 32, 33, 34, 54, 66]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%