1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)81008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders in Bone Marrow Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
189
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
189
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been demonstrated in this observational clinicopathological study, repeatedly performed BM trephines lend further support to the fact that only a fraction (about 35%) of the total series was compatible with (true) ET. Considering these findings and previous clinical [11,32,33] and morphological data [6,7,13,30,34,39,40] as well as cell culture studies [41][42][43], the WHO criteria [12] should be slightly modified by defining a lower limit of the platelet count. Finally, when comparing the diagnostic implications of histopathology with that of colony assays, one has to keep in mind that cell culture studies are burdensome and time-consuming and that interpretations are limited to an experienced observer in this speciality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been demonstrated in this observational clinicopathological study, repeatedly performed BM trephines lend further support to the fact that only a fraction (about 35%) of the total series was compatible with (true) ET. Considering these findings and previous clinical [11,32,33] and morphological data [6,7,13,30,34,39,40] as well as cell culture studies [41][42][43], the WHO criteria [12] should be slightly modified by defining a lower limit of the platelet count. Finally, when comparing the diagnostic implications of histopathology with that of colony assays, one has to keep in mind that cell culture studies are burdensome and time-consuming and that interpretations are limited to an experienced observer in this speciality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michiels et al and the German pathologists Georgii and Thiele recognized that small mono-or bi-nucleated megakaryocytes are diagnostic for the Ph-positive diseases ET and CML. In contrast, large megakaryocytes with hyper-lobulated nuclei are pathognomonic for Ph-negative essential thrombocythemia (Figures 1 and 2) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The Hannover Bone Marrow Classification of CML and MPD regarded myelofibrosis (MF) as a reactive secondary feature of myeloproliferative disease.…”
Section: The Hannover Bone Marrow Classification Of CML and The Mpds mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hannover Bone Marrow Classification of CML and MPD regarded myelofibrosis (MF) as a reactive secondary feature of myeloproliferative disease. The terms agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM), myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis (MMM), and chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) lack accuracy because it is applied to both the early prefibrotic hypercellular stage and the advanced fibrotic stages [15,16]. Secondary MF in ET, PV and CMGM is classified as reticulin fibrosis (RF) grade 0 and 1 (=MF 0), RF grade 2 (=MF 1), RF 3 with minor collagen fibrosis (=MF 2) and advanced reticulin-collagen fibrosis (RCF) with or without osteosclerosis (=MF 3) [17,18].…”
Section: The Hannover Bone Marrow Classification Of CML and The Mpds mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations