1995
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199511000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia model of depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rats could interrupt a convergent light beam by poking their noses into the hole to trigger a rewarding intracranial electrical stimulation via an electrode stereotaxically implanted within the mesolimbic system at the level of the ventral tegmental area. Thresholds for self-stimulation behavior were determined as described (27). A group of 16 Wistar rats (300-350 g) were implanted for the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats could interrupt a convergent light beam by poking their noses into the hole to trigger a rewarding intracranial electrical stimulation via an electrode stereotaxically implanted within the mesolimbic system at the level of the ventral tegmental area. Thresholds for self-stimulation behavior were determined as described (27). A group of 16 Wistar rats (300-350 g) were implanted for the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, it was recently shown in rodents that chronic unpredictable stress affects suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) functionality, the central pacemaker of the circadian system in mammals, by dampening the amplitude of circadian PERIOD2 (PER2) protein expression, one of the main clock proteins involved in internal rhythm generation (Jiang et al 2011). In addition, various biological diurnal rhythms generated and fine-tuned by the SCN such as locomotor activity (Gorka et al 1996), body temperature (Ushijima et al 2006), heart rate (Grippo et al 2003), sleep (Moreau et al 1995), and plasma glucocorticoid (GC) levels (Ottenweller et al 1994) are also affected by repeated exposure to non-psychosocial stressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, CMS suppresses the consumption of and preference for palatable sweet solutions (Willner et al 1987), and the rewarding properties of food pellets, sweet solutions, and amphetamine, as assessed by the place preference conditioning procedure (Papp et al 1991). CMS furthermore increases thresholds for ventral tegmental self-stimulation, indicating a decreased responsiveness to rewarding stimuli (Moreau et al 1995). This decrease in sensitivity to reward is assumed to model human anhedonia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%