2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2376-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: 28-year experience of endovascular treatment

Abstract: • Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis is often responsible for ischaemic symptoms. • Treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) seems superior to stenting • Although technical success rates are improved with the use of stents. • Higher mortality in the elderly and those presenting with nausea/vomiting/bloody stools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, volumetric reconstruction of data makes CT a useful tool during pre-procedural planning of a percutaneous approach. The treatment of the mesenteric vessels involves the aorta or mesenteric vessel origin more than 95% of the time [6][7][8]. The infrarenal abdominal aorta develops atherosclerotic changes earlier than the supra-renal aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, volumetric reconstruction of data makes CT a useful tool during pre-procedural planning of a percutaneous approach. The treatment of the mesenteric vessels involves the aorta or mesenteric vessel origin more than 95% of the time [6][7][8]. The infrarenal abdominal aorta develops atherosclerotic changes earlier than the supra-renal aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good clinical outcomes have been reported with 1-year primary and secondary patency rates of 40%-70% and 85%-95%, respectively. [1][2][3][4] Bare-metal and covered stents have both been used, with early data suggesting a possible advantage to the covered variety. 5 Although cardiopulmonary complications and overall morbidity are higher with open surgery, mortality rates are comparable at 5%-10%, 6 and mesenteric artery complications with percutaneous approaches drastically increase the risk of subsequent death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turba et al reported a retrospective series of 166 consecutive patients undergoing ET for CMI [31]. The technical success rate was 97% per patient and was higher for stenting than PTA (99.4 vs 86%; p = 0.0001).…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Disadvantages of the brachial approach include the need for longer catheters and devices due to increased distance from the target vessels, limited maximal sheath size of 7 Fr without surgical exposure of the brachial artery and the risk of embolic stroke from wire manipulation in the aortic arch. One recent study has shown that the type of guidewire or device platform, brachial versus femoral access, and the presentation (stenosis vs total occlusion) had no impact on mortality or primary patency [31].…”
Section: Management and Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%