Chronic kidney disease with elevated myocardial native T1 – Is this only due to myocardial fibrosis?

Ng, Ming-Yen; Yap, Pui Min; Yiu, Kai Hang

doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100403

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an important tool for non–invasive IF evaluation in the kidney [ 1 , 4 ]. T1 mapping is a parametric map where each pixel of a kidney image represents the T1 spin-lattice relaxation time, which depends on the molecular environment [ 5 ]. In addition, the T1 is sensitive to pathological changes occurring in the tissues and can easily differentiate cortex and medulla.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of automatically measured T1 map cortico-medullary difference (ΔT1) for eGFR and fibrosis assessment in allograft kidneys

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MRI T1-mapping is an important non-invasive tool for renal diagnosis. Previous work shows that ΔT1 (cortex-medullary difference in T1) has significant correlation with interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) allograft patients. However, measuring cortico-medullary values by manually drawing ROIs over cortex and medulla (a gold standard method) is challenging, time-consuming, subjective and requires human training. Moreover, such subjective ROI placement may also affect the work reproducibility. This work proposes a deep learning-based 2D U-Net (RCM U-Net) to auto-segment the renal cortex and medulla of CKD allograft kidney T1 maps. Furthermore, this study presents a correlation of automatically measured ΔT1 values with eGFR and percentage fibrosis in allograft kidneys. Also, the RCM U-Net correlation results are compared with the manual ROI correlation analysis. The RCM U-Net has been trained and validated on T1 maps from 40 patients (n = 2400 augmented images) and tested on 10 patients (n = 600 augmented images). The RCM U-Net segmentation results are compared with the standard VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50 networks with U-Net as backbone. For clinical validation of the RCM U-Net segmentation, another set of 114 allograft kidneys patient’s cortex and medulla were automatically segmented to measure the ΔT1 values and correlated with eGFR and fibrosis. Overall, the RCM U-Net showed 50% less Mean Absolute Error (MAE), 16% better Dice Coefficient (DC) score and 12% improved results in terms of Sensitivity (SE) over conventional CNNs (i.e. VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50) while the Specificity (SP) and Accuracy (ACC) did not show significant improvement (i.e. 0.5% improvement) for both cortex and medulla segmentation. For eGFR and fibrosis assessment, the proposed RCM U-Net correlation coefficient (r) and R-square (R2) was better correlated (r = -0.2, R2 = 0.041 with p = 0.039) to eGFR than manual ROI values (r = -0.19, R2 = 0.037 with p = 0.051). Similarly, the proposed RCM U-Net had noticeably better r and R2 values (r = 0.25, R2 = 0.065 with p = 0.007) for the correlation with the renal percentage fibrosis than the Manual ROI results (r = 0.3, R2 = 0.091 and p = 0.0013). Using a linear mixed model, T1 was significantly higher in the medulla than in the cortex (p<0.0001) and significantly lower in patients with cellular rejection when compared to both patients without rejection and those with humoral rejection (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in T1 between patients with and without humoral rejection (p = 0.43), nor between the types of T1 measurements (Gold standard manual versus automated RCM U-Net) (p = 0.7). The cortico-medullary area ratio measured by the RCM U-Net was significantly increased in case of cellular rejection by comparison to humoral rejection (1.6 +/- 0.39 versus 0.99 +/- 0.32, p = 0.019). In conclusion, the proposed RCM U-Net provides more robust auto-segmented cortex and medulla than the other standard CNNs allowing a good correlation of ΔT1 with eGFR and fibrosis as reported in literature as well as the differentiation of cellular and humoral transplant rejection. Therefore, the proposed approach is a promising alternative to the gold standard manual ROI method to measure T1 values without user interaction, which helps to reduce analysis time and improves reproducibility.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%