“…Since then, the association between HCV infection and incident diabetes has been widely examined in different populations. Previous studies have confirmed that HCV infection increases the risk of diabetes by 41% to 53% in the non‐transplant population, and 1.55‐ to 2.68‐fold in liver transplant recipients . However, in KTRs, results on the association between HCV infection and NODAT were conflicting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to hepatitis viruses, especially hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as their extrahepatic effects on glucose metabolism. Results from the non-transplant population suggested a notable association between HCV infection and diabetes, [8][9][10] but the association between HBV infection and diabetes remained controversial. [11][12][13][14][15] However, in a transplant setting, especially in KTRs, consensus regarding the association between hepatitis virus infection and diabetes is lacking.…”
Preoperative HCV infection significantly increased the risk of NODAT in Chinese KTRs, whereas HBV infection and HBC + HCV coinfection were not correlated with NODAT development.
“…Since then, the association between HCV infection and incident diabetes has been widely examined in different populations. Previous studies have confirmed that HCV infection increases the risk of diabetes by 41% to 53% in the non‐transplant population, and 1.55‐ to 2.68‐fold in liver transplant recipients . However, in KTRs, results on the association between HCV infection and NODAT were conflicting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to hepatitis viruses, especially hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as their extrahepatic effects on glucose metabolism. Results from the non-transplant population suggested a notable association between HCV infection and diabetes, [8][9][10] but the association between HBV infection and diabetes remained controversial. [11][12][13][14][15] However, in a transplant setting, especially in KTRs, consensus regarding the association between hepatitis virus infection and diabetes is lacking.…”
Preoperative HCV infection significantly increased the risk of NODAT in Chinese KTRs, whereas HBV infection and HBC + HCV coinfection were not correlated with NODAT development.
“…In addition to hepatic diseases, chronic HCV infection was found to cause extrahepatic diseases 46–48 . However, less than 15% of chronic hepatitis C patients seek clinical care; thus, the community effectiveness of treatment is approximately 7–11% 49, 50 .…”
This follow-up study enrolled chronic hepatitis C patients to evaluate the treatment efficacy and to identify post-treatment seromarkers associated with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) or nonsustained virological response (NSVR). A total of 4639 patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin during 2004–2013 were followed until December 2014. HCC was confirmed through health examinations and data linkage with a national database. A total of 233 HCC cases were reported after 26,163 person-years of follow-up, indicating an incidence of 8.9 per 1000 person-years: 6.9 for SVR and 21.6 for NSVR per 1000 person-years. The associated risk of HCC in patients with SVR was 0.37 (0.22–0.63) for those without cirrhosis and 0.54 (0.31–0.92) for those with cirrhosis compared with their respective counterparts with NSVR. Among patients with SVR, advanced age, male gender, cirrhosis, decreased platelet count, and increased aspartate aminotransferase and α-fetoprotein levels were associated with HCC (p < 0.001). The treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients before they developed cirrhosis showed a higher efficacy than did the treatment of those who had already developed cirrhosis. Patients with SVR may still have a risk of HCC and need to be regularly monitored.
“…After adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) for developing DM in viremic patients was 1.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31–2.02, P < 0.01) . While other studies have not found a relationship between HCV infection and DM risk, a recent meta‐analysis of 34 studies including over 200,000 patients supported this association . Data from the interferon (IFN) era demonstrated that sustained virological response (SVR) was associated with reduced risk of developing insulin resistance, improved glycemic control, and a reduced occurrence of ESRD, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome in DM patients .…”
Section: Dm and Hcvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 While other studies have not found a relationship between HCV infection and DM risk, a recent meta-analysis of 34 studies including over 200,000 patients supported this association. 8,9 Data from the interferon (IFN) era demonstrated that sustained virological response (SVR) was associated with reduced risk of developing insulin resistance, improved glycemic control, and a reduced occurrence of ESRD, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome in DM patients. 10,11 More recently, treatment with the IFN free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has also been associated with better outcomes in HCV-infected patients with DM: improved glycemic control as evidenced by decreased in mean HbA1c, in the use of antidiabetic medications and in insulin had been reported in patients achieving SVR.…”
Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney transplant recipients. Little information exists on treatment in patients with CKD stages 2 to 3, where CKD progression might be slowed by HCV treatment. These patients are not considered a high priority for HCV treatment in most international guidelines. Although some recently published guidelines propose universal treatment, others are still recommending it only in high priority groups. In this review, we evaluate current evidence of HCV infection impact on CKD progression, on cardiovascular and metabolic risk, and the benefits of HCV infection treatment to improve cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes. We made special focus on the benefits of HCV infection treatment in patients with stages 2 to 3 CKD to avoid CKD progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.