2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13592-022-00937-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic exposure to a field-realistic concentration of Closer® SC (24% sulfoxaflor) insecticide impacted the growth and foraging activity of honey bee colonies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For sulfoxaflor, application concentrations are typically higher in the field (relative to imidacloprid), and recent studies have found sulfoxaflor residues in nectar and pollen of a variety of treated crops >10 μg/L (Jiang et al, 2020) and >150 μg/L (Cheng et al, 2018; US EPA, 2016; Zhou et al, 2022) when applied close to the blooming period. Whilst bees in experiment 2 provisioned with sulfoxaflor sucrose solution consumed more on average than imidacloprid bees (and thus received a higher sulfoxaflor dosage) we still found little consistent effect of sulfoxaflor, despite other studies exposing bees to concentrations similar or under that used in our experiments 2 and 3 finding impacts on different behaviours (El‐Din et al, 2022; Linguadoca et al, 2021; Siviter et al, 2020; Siviter, Brown, et al, 2018; Siviter, Koricheva, et al, 2018; Taning et al, 2019). Interestingly, Boff et al (2021) found sulfoxaflor exposure at 50 ppb, but not 10 ppb, led to impaired flight and foraging in a solitary bee.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sulfoxaflor, application concentrations are typically higher in the field (relative to imidacloprid), and recent studies have found sulfoxaflor residues in nectar and pollen of a variety of treated crops >10 μg/L (Jiang et al, 2020) and >150 μg/L (Cheng et al, 2018; US EPA, 2016; Zhou et al, 2022) when applied close to the blooming period. Whilst bees in experiment 2 provisioned with sulfoxaflor sucrose solution consumed more on average than imidacloprid bees (and thus received a higher sulfoxaflor dosage) we still found little consistent effect of sulfoxaflor, despite other studies exposing bees to concentrations similar or under that used in our experiments 2 and 3 finding impacts on different behaviours (El‐Din et al, 2022; Linguadoca et al, 2021; Siviter et al, 2020; Siviter, Brown, et al, 2018; Siviter, Koricheva, et al, 2018; Taning et al, 2019). Interestingly, Boff et al (2021) found sulfoxaflor exposure at 50 ppb, but not 10 ppb, led to impaired flight and foraging in a solitary bee.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Whilst bees in experiment 2 provisioned with sulfoxaflor sucrose solution consumed more on average than imidacloprid bees (and thus received a higher sulfoxaflor dosage) we still found little consistent effect of sulfoxaflor, despite other studies exposing bees to concentrations similar or under that used in our experiments 2 and 3 finding impacts on different behaviours (El-Din et al, 2022;Linguadoca et al, 2021;Siviter et al, 2020;Siviter, Koricheva, et al, 2018;Taning et al, 2019).…”
Section: Comparative Lower Sublethal Impacts Of Sulfoxaflor On Behaviourcontrasting
confidence: 71%