While acute endometritis is a reasonably well-defined entity of ascending infection and attendant active inflammation, chronic endometritis is less well defined. As part of a broad effort to define and refine the diagnostic criteria and management of the disease, we conducted a survey of pathologists to understand the variability in diagnostic criteria and implications of the diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis. Members of national and international professional pathology societies were surveyed utilizing anonymous electronic surveys designed to examine diagnostic criteria, etiological understanding and treatment implications of a pathologic diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis. There was substantial variability among pathologists in the diagnostic criteria used for making a diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis, with 28.5% of pathologists using the presence of a single plasma cell for making the diagnosis. There was additional variability in the use of special stains, reporting in the presence of coexisting lesions and the hormonal stage of the endometrium. There were no differences between generalists and specialists in the diagnostic criteria used, except the significantly greater likelihood of specialists making the diagnosis in gestational endometrium. The substantial variability in diagnostic criteria for nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis among pathologists, including among gynecologic pathologists, has the potential to confound the management of patients. Standardization of diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis is essential to understand the implications of the diagnosis.