“…These differences can be attributed to a number of factors that vary between natural and artificial habitats, including the nature and intensity of environmental stress, abiotic and biotic characteristics of the environment that interact with animals, whether the potential for avoidance exists, the influence of artificial and natural selection on traits within each population, and the fate and partitioning behaviors of aquatic contaminants that affect bioavailability (and thus, exposure and risk). − Consequently, it is not uncommon for laboratory-derived water quality criteria and/or effect concentrations to under or overpredict toxicity for wild fish populations . growing body of laboratory-derived evidence suggests that current environmental concentrations of metformin may be sufficient to alter the reproduction and/or development of small-bodied prey fish. ,,,,,,− Given the potential importance of metformin as a ubiquitous pseudopersistent environmental contaminant, − ,,, the variability in laboratory study outcomes to date, ,− ,,,, and the need for highly representative toxicity data to inform regulatory decisions, , the present study utilizes a multiple-lines-of-evidence approach to investigate the developmental effects of metformin on a widely distributed small-bodied model fish species, the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).…”