2013
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31828054b7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Effect of Static Stretching on Strength Performance and Basal Serum IGF-1 Levels

Abstract: Improving the process of how physical performance is enhanced is one of the main topics evaluated by physiologists. This process often involves athletes and nonathletic populations. The purpose of this study was to assess the chronic response to 10 weeks of static stretching exercises carried out before and during a strength training program for 8 exercises on an 8 repetition maximum (8RM) test performance, and basal serum insulinlike growth factor (IGF-1) levels. Thirty recreationally trained volunteers were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies applied stretching on the lower body involving plantar flexors, knee eor hip extensors and flexors, except two, shoulder horizontal flexors and extensors (82), and shoulder adductors (91), which performed stretching on the lumbar spine extensors. Six studies also applied stretching in the upper body, involving the elbow extensors and shoulder adductors (8,18,29,50,69,79). The most frequent form of stretching intervention was static stretching, although PNF (13,41,56,76), dynamic (3,19,50), and ballistic (42,49) modalities were also performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All studies applied stretching on the lower body involving plantar flexors, knee eor hip extensors and flexors, except two, shoulder horizontal flexors and extensors (82), and shoulder adductors (91), which performed stretching on the lumbar spine extensors. Six studies also applied stretching in the upper body, involving the elbow extensors and shoulder adductors (8,18,29,50,69,79). The most frequent form of stretching intervention was static stretching, although PNF (13,41,56,76), dynamic (3,19,50), and ballistic (42,49) modalities were also performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study compared traditional RT vs. interset rest stretching RT protocols and did observe a small advantage in muscle thickness for the stretching group but no significant differences in strength gains between the groups (18). Other groups have also tried to explore the effects of stretching combined with RT on measures of strength and observed conflicting results (8,64,81). However, dissimilarities regarding study designs and exercise protocols (e.g., stretch typology, duration, and timing) may explain the dissimilar outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even short 10 min high- or low-intensity exercise bouts elicit increases in serum IGF-1 concentrations [ 96 ]. Strength training induced acute increases [ 30 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ] and raised resting serum IGF-1 levels [ 101 ]. However, other groups studying strength training reported no change in peripheral IGF-1 levels in 18–30 years old [ 33 ], in 18–25 years old [ 102 ], and in 30 and 62 years old [ 90 ] healthy humans.…”
Section: Insulin Growth Factor 1 (Igf-1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuto tezi podporuje i práce Mohamada, Nosaka a Cronina (2011) kdy uvádějí, že statický strečink může vyvolávat nervosvalovou, metabolickou a hormonální odezvu s možným zvýšením hypertrofického efektu. Vliv statického strečinku na přírůstek síly z dlouhodobého hlediska zkoumali ve své studii také Borges et al (2013). Tři nezávislé skupiny prováděly po dobu deseti týdnů stejný silový trénink s tím rozdílem, že první skupina zařadila statický strečink do rozcvičení, druhá skupina jej aplikovala před každou posilovací položkou a třetí skupina absolvovala celý program bez strečinku.…”
Section: ) Vliv Statického Strečinku Na Svalový Výkonunclassified