2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic constipation: no longer stuck! characterization of colonic dysmotility as a new disorder in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). One child (6 years old) with chronic treatment-resistant constipation had seromuscular biopsies collected laparoscopically (King et al 2005) as part of an investigation for changes in SP-, VIP-and NOS-immunoreactive fibres (Hutson et al 2004). This sample was found to have normal levels of these nerve fibres.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). One child (6 years old) with chronic treatment-resistant constipation had seromuscular biopsies collected laparoscopically (King et al 2005) as part of an investigation for changes in SP-, VIP-and NOS-immunoreactive fibres (Hutson et al 2004). This sample was found to have normal levels of these nerve fibres.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions recognise 2 different pathophysiologic moments as previously demonstrated in adults [4,5]. STC represents a more generalised disturbance of colonic motility in which a reduction of the interstitial cells of Cajal in the myenteric plexus and at the submucosal border has been demonstrated [10] together with a reduction in neurotransmitters as substance P or vasoactive intestinal peptide [9]. FRSO represents a more localised alteration of the rectosigmoid area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Low levels of SP have, however, been reported in both adults [16] and children [21,22,26,27] with STC, suggesting that low SP may be associated with reduced colonic activity. It is not yet known if low SP is a primary anomaly or secondary to chronic constipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%