1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00160-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Comorbidity and Outcomes of Hospital Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prognostic comorbidity was calculated using the Charlson comorbidity index, originally created to help predict long term mortality [36]. The Charlson comorbidity index has been found reliable and valid in predicting mortality and length of hospitalization [37, 38]. The index is a list of 17 conditions, with each condition assigned a weight of 1, 2, 3, or 6, where HIV and metastatic carcinoma give the highest weight of 6 and less severe conditions such as mild liver disease and diabetes without complications give a score of 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognostic comorbidity was calculated using the Charlson comorbidity index, originally created to help predict long term mortality [36]. The Charlson comorbidity index has been found reliable and valid in predicting mortality and length of hospitalization [37, 38]. The index is a list of 17 conditions, with each condition assigned a weight of 1, 2, 3, or 6, where HIV and metastatic carcinoma give the highest weight of 6 and less severe conditions such as mild liver disease and diabetes without complications give a score of 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables included in the study that might be associated with the use of early surgery as well as with the probability of death were: age (divided into four categories: 60-69, 70-79, 80-89 and 90-years-old and over), sex, main diagnosis (grouped into three groups: intracapsular fractures (ICD9CM: 820.0x a 820.1x), trochanteric fractures (ICD9CM: 820.2x a 820.3x) and non-otherwise specified fractures (ICD9CM: 820.8 y 820.9), number of secondary diagnoses (grouped into four categories: 0-1, 2-3, 4-6, and > 6), surgical procedure (distinguishing between fixation and arthroplasty), Risk Mortality Index (RMI) modified from the one used by Majumdar et al [15,30] (unfortunately MBDS does not allow differentiation between comorbidities and complications because it does not record the onset of a diagnosis of complications; see Additional File 1 for codes and weights used), Charlson Comorbidity Index calculated following an adaptation of the Charlson Index [31] for administrative databases [32,33]. Our version, as in other Charlson Index adaptations for administrative databases [34,35], distinguishes between codes defining chronic conditions (always accounted for) and acute conditions (those not to be considered in the current admission but in the following admissions; see Additional File 2 for codes and weights used).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, multimorbidity includes only CDand its prevalence increases with age [3], [7] and social deprivation [7], [8]. It has been shown to be associated with increased medical consultation, prescription, psychological distress, emergency utilization, hospital length of stay, and mortality rates [9], [10], [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%