2016
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Chagas Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Performance of Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay Tests

Abstract: Abstract. There is a significant heterogeneity in reported performance of serological assays for Chagas disease diagnosis. The conventional serology testing in laboratory diagnosis and in blood banks is unsatisfactory because of a high number of inconclusive and misclassified results. We aimed to assess the quality of four commercially available enzymelinked immunosorbent assay tests for their ability to detect Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in 685 sera samples. Crossreactivity was assessed by using 748 sera fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples from individuals with dengue virus (n ϭ 50), hepatitis B virus (n ϭ 160), hepatitis C virus (n ϭ 98), human immunodeficiency virus (n ϭ 144), human T-cell lymphotropic virus (n ϭ 109), leishmaniasis (n ϭ 18), leptospirosis (n ϭ 92), rubella virus (n ϭ 15), measles (n ϭ 21), and syphilis (n ϭ 144) were used to assess cross-reactivity between the IBMP chimeras and proteins associated with unrelated diseases. Before LMA analysis, all sera were reevaluated using 2 commercial ELISAs, namely, the Imuno-ELISA Chagas test (Wama Diagnostica, São Paulo, Brazil; batch 14D061) and the ELISA Chagas III test (BIOSChile, Ingeniaría Genética S.A., Santiago, Chile; batch 1F130525) (27). Each sample was assigned a numeric code in the laboratory to ensure a blinded analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples from individuals with dengue virus (n ϭ 50), hepatitis B virus (n ϭ 160), hepatitis C virus (n ϭ 98), human immunodeficiency virus (n ϭ 144), human T-cell lymphotropic virus (n ϭ 109), leishmaniasis (n ϭ 18), leptospirosis (n ϭ 92), rubella virus (n ϭ 15), measles (n ϭ 21), and syphilis (n ϭ 144) were used to assess cross-reactivity between the IBMP chimeras and proteins associated with unrelated diseases. Before LMA analysis, all sera were reevaluated using 2 commercial ELISAs, namely, the Imuno-ELISA Chagas test (Wama Diagnostica, São Paulo, Brazil; batch 14D061) and the ELISA Chagas III test (BIOSChile, Ingeniaría Genética S.A., Santiago, Chile; batch 1F130525) (27). Each sample was assigned a numeric code in the laboratory to ensure a blinded analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample selection was based on positivity or negativity by two serological tests for CD: Imuno-ELISA Chagas (Wama Diagnóstica, São Palo, Brazil, batch 14D061), which is based on recombinant antigens; and ELISA Chagas III (BIOSChile, Ingeniería Genética S.A., Santiago, Chile, batch 1F130525), which uses whole extracts of T . cruzi strains Mn and Tulahuen as antigens [ 33 ]. Samples with disagreeing results between both tests or judged to be inconclusive in one of them were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of these assays varies greatly because of the antigen preparations used to detect the anti– T. cruzi antibodies, in addition to genetic heterogeneity among circulating strains. 16 , 18 Because no reference standard is currently available for CD, the World Health Organization has advocated the use of two tests in parallel for serodiagnostic verification. Under these circumstances, the diagnostic accuracy of novel methodologies cannot be evaluated in an unbiased manner, because the comparison of results implies the use of an imperfect reference standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%