1979
DOI: 10.1177/000992287901801103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic and Occult Stool Retention

Abstract: A scoring method was developed to assess severity of stool retention using plain abdominal radiographs. To determine whether the technique was clinically valid in identifying chronic stool retention, the method was used to evaluate films taken of children with known stool retention before and after therapy. The method showed significant statistical differences between symptomatic pre-therapy films and controls and between pre- and post-therapy films of treatment "successes." No significant differences were fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plain abdominal radiograph is performed to identify the degree of fecal loading in the colon and rectum 45-47. It is considered to be useful in children who are not willing to undergo a rectal examination due to pain and fear 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plain abdominal radiograph is performed to identify the degree of fecal loading in the colon and rectum 45-47. It is considered to be useful in children who are not willing to undergo a rectal examination due to pain and fear 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fekal impakt; fizik muayenede alt abdo- mende ele gelen sert kitle, rektal muayenede dilate rektumda palpe edilen sertleşmiş iri dışkı kitlesi veya karın radyografisinde kolonda gözlenen aşırı dışkı birikimi şeklinde kendini gösterebilir (13) . Oral ve/veya rektal yolla uygulanan ilaçlarla kesinlikle temizlenmelidir.…”
Section: Fonksiyonel Kabızlık Tedavisiunclassified
“…To date three scoring systems have been described to assess the severity of faecal loading using an abdominal radiograph in constipated children [24]. These papers described a good diagnostic accuracy, with more than 80% of the constipated and non-constipated patients identified correctly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluated by others however, accuracy was lower with an area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operator characteristics of 0.68 for the Leech method [5] 0.84 and 0.74, respectively, for the Barr and Blethyn scoring methods [6]. Another important parameter for the usefulness of these methods, intraobserver and interobserver agreement, was good to excellent in the original description of these methods [24]. Although some investigators could reproduce this for the Leech [7] and Barr scores [8], others could not, finding a much lower intra- and interobserver agreement [5, 6, 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation