2012
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic abdominal pain in children: help in spotting the organic diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3 In a study conducted in the United Kingdom (UK), 10-14% of school-age children were diagnosed with recurrent abdominal pain, and 5-10% of these were due to organic causes. 9,10 The diagnosis of chronic appendicitis is based on history taking, physical examination, and laboratory tests. From the history, the child has complained of recurrent abdominal pain since 3 months before 2487 admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 In a study conducted in the United Kingdom (UK), 10-14% of school-age children were diagnosed with recurrent abdominal pain, and 5-10% of these were due to organic causes. 9,10 The diagnosis of chronic appendicitis is based on history taking, physical examination, and laboratory tests. From the history, the child has complained of recurrent abdominal pain since 3 months before 2487 admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abnormal growth, fever, uveitis, mouth ulcers, erythema nodosum, arthritis, icterus, suspected anemia, persistent abdominal pain localized in the right upper or lower quadrant, and/or perianal abnormalities). Finally, patients under 4 years of age were excluded due to a higher pre-test probability of underlying somatic causes [45].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the guidelines, extensive diagnostic tests are not recommended in view of a low pre-test probability of finding a somatic cause [3]. In addition, this policy may serve to reduce financial costs, minimize nonspecific findings, and remove fear for painful diagnostic testing [456]. Despite well-defined guidelines, it is unknown whether pediatricians adhere to the guidelines during daily clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laborchemische Diagnostik ist bei Abwesenheit von Alarmzeichen nicht hilfreich im Nachweis organischer Erkrankungen und wird daher nicht routinemäßig empfohlen (6,15). Eine weitere Abklärung ändert sehr selten das Management und hat auch keinen positiven Einfluss auf die Prognose, kann aber beim Nachweis von klinisch unbedeutenden Nebenbefunden zu unnötigen Tests und Verängstigungen der betroffenen Kinder und Eltern führen (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Alarmzeichen In Der Abklärung Dyspeptischer Beschwerdenunclassified