2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(00)00380-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomes 1 and 12 abnormalities in pediatric germ cell tumors by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Perlman et al detected loss at 1p in five of seven cases analyzed with conventional cytogenetic techniques, indicating significant observer-dependent differences in the assessment of 1p alterations (Perlman et al, 1994). Complementary FISH analyses using a 1p36 cosmid probe coupled with a centromeric or 1q probe reported a relative reduction in the number of 1p36 signals compared to the centromeric or 1q signals in up to 80% of childhood YSTs (Jenderny et al, 1996;Perlman et al, 1996;Stock et al, 1996;Bussey et al, 2001). However, since conventional chromosomal CGH revealed infrequent loss at distal 1p but frequent gain of 1q, including the centromeric region, there has been some debate whether the results of the FISH studies were related to gain of 1q rather than loss of 1p Schneider et al, 2001Schneider et al, (a), 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Perlman et al detected loss at 1p in five of seven cases analyzed with conventional cytogenetic techniques, indicating significant observer-dependent differences in the assessment of 1p alterations (Perlman et al, 1994). Complementary FISH analyses using a 1p36 cosmid probe coupled with a centromeric or 1q probe reported a relative reduction in the number of 1p36 signals compared to the centromeric or 1q signals in up to 80% of childhood YSTs (Jenderny et al, 1996;Perlman et al, 1996;Stock et al, 1996;Bussey et al, 2001). However, since conventional chromosomal CGH revealed infrequent loss at distal 1p but frequent gain of 1q, including the centromeric region, there has been some debate whether the results of the FISH studies were related to gain of 1q rather than loss of 1p Schneider et al, 2001Schneider et al, (a), 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chromosomal loss at 1p has also been noted in several cases of adolescent testicular and ovarian GCTs and in pediatric GCTs (Perlman et al, 1994;Bussey et al, 1999;Perlman et al, 2000;Mostert et al, 2000;Schneider et al, 2001(a); Bussey et al, 2001;Schneider et al, 2002;van Echten et al, 2002). Of note, these studies were based on FISH, CGH, or cytogenetic analyses, which detect chromosomal copy number loss but do not determine true allelic loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,[75][76][77][78][79][80] While virtually all adult cases are aneuploid, pediatric cases are mostly diploid, particularly teratomas, although yolk sac tumors may be nondiploid. Imprinting studies suggest that both arise from primordial germ cells but at a different stage of germ cell development.…”
Section: Molecular Biology Of Germ Cell Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i(12p) and 12p amplification are rare events in pediatric tumors. Bussey et al 77 found that 12p amplification in childhood GCT was age dependent and only seen in patients above the age of 9 years. On the other hand, pediatric tumors are characterized by deletions of 1p, particularly region p36, loss of 6q, and structural abnormalities of chromosome 2 and 3p.…”
Section: Molecular Biology Of Germ Cell Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the pattern of genomic gains and losses between the histological subtypes was broadly similar, except for gains of chromosome 15 in seminomas compared to nonseminomas (Looijenga, 2001). In the paediatric population, DNA ploidy was found to be variable (diploid, triploid and tetraploid) (Looijenga and Oosterhuis, 1999;Bussey et al, 2001;Schneider et al, 2001) while ovarian GCTs are mostly diploid, independent of age (Surti et al, 1990).…”
Section: Chromosomal Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%