“…A recent revision of the family Hypopterygiaceae by Kruijer (2002) has renamed a number of former Hypopterygium species. Newton (1973) Newton (1973) is n=5 and is the same for Australia examined meiotically (Ramsay 1974). The meiotic chromosome number recorded here for Cyathophorum bulbosum from Dunedin (Table 2) had the same chromosome number n=5 and similar bivalents to the Australian collections examined previously.…”
Section: Family Hypopterygiaceaesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Family Bartramiaceae Beever et al (1992) report three species of Philonotis from New Zealand. The mitotic chromosome number of n=6 was recorded for Philonotis tenuis from the South Island by Newton (1973). Previous chromosome records for other species in the genus are (Fritsch 1991, Goldblatt & Johnson 2000 from Europe, India, Japan, Australia, China and Chile.…”
Additional chromosome information, based on meiotic studies, is reported here for 27 species (of which eight are endemic) in 22 genera of New Zealand mosses in the following 14 families:
“…A recent revision of the family Hypopterygiaceae by Kruijer (2002) has renamed a number of former Hypopterygium species. Newton (1973) Newton (1973) is n=5 and is the same for Australia examined meiotically (Ramsay 1974). The meiotic chromosome number recorded here for Cyathophorum bulbosum from Dunedin (Table 2) had the same chromosome number n=5 and similar bivalents to the Australian collections examined previously.…”
Section: Family Hypopterygiaceaesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Family Bartramiaceae Beever et al (1992) report three species of Philonotis from New Zealand. The mitotic chromosome number of n=6 was recorded for Philonotis tenuis from the South Island by Newton (1973). Previous chromosome records for other species in the genus are (Fritsch 1991, Goldblatt & Johnson 2000 from Europe, India, Japan, Australia, China and Chile.…”
Additional chromosome information, based on meiotic studies, is reported here for 27 species (of which eight are endemic) in 22 genera of New Zealand mosses in the following 14 families:
“…In his revision of the genus for Australia, Gilmore (2006) does not mention having examined the specimen of P. harrrisi but when the above collection was compared to specimens of Philonotis tenuis named by Gilmore, it was found to be identical and P. harrisi is thus placed into synonymy with P tenuis. Newton (1973) recorded n=6 from gametophytic mitotic studies of P. tenuis from New Zealand. The chromosome voucher (58/63) named as P. harrisi from Eungella in Queensland in Ramsay (1967aRamsay ( , 1974 has been re-examined and corrected to P. tenuis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Newton (1973) at mitosis and Ramsay (2009) at meiosis have reported n=5 for New Zealand specimens.…”
Section: Family Hypopterygiaceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25) and H. menziesii n=5 (Newton 1973) from gametophytic mitosis from New Zealand. There are no previous reports of mitotic counts in species with the number n=4.…”
Meiotic chromosome numbers, of some 180 collections are presented, comprising 80 species in 57 genera of Australian mosses from the following 29 families: Bartramiaceae, Brachytheciaceae,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.