2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome Segregation Fidelity in Epithelia Requires Tissue Architecture

Abstract: Much of our understanding of chromosome segregation is based on cell culture systems. Here, we examine the importance of the tissue environment for chromosome segregation by comparing chromosome segregation fidelity across several primary cell types in native and nonnative contexts. We discover that epithelial cells have increased chromosome missegregation outside of their native tissues. Using organoid culture systems, we show that tissue architecture, specifically integrin function, is required for accurate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
115
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also the case in 3D culture, where mitotic rounding generates force in all directions 11 , similar to cells in the tissue context. Environment context is also important for the fidelity of cell division: recent work has shown that primary epithelial cells cultured in 3D suffer fewer chromosome segregation defects than in 2D 37 . Conversely, cell culture in a stiff 3D gel that limits anaphase elongation also induces chromosomal segregation defects 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the case in 3D culture, where mitotic rounding generates force in all directions 11 , similar to cells in the tissue context. Environment context is also important for the fidelity of cell division: recent work has shown that primary epithelial cells cultured in 3D suffer fewer chromosome segregation defects than in 2D 37 . Conversely, cell culture in a stiff 3D gel that limits anaphase elongation also induces chromosomal segregation defects 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultured cancer cell lines are limited disease models in that they do not recapitulate the tumor microenvironment nor interactions with the immune system [1][2][3][4][5][6], fundamental properties of cellular organization are altered in culture [7], and their response to anticancer drugs is affected by both assay heterogeneity [8] and genomic alterations acquired in vitro [9]. However, cancer cell lines still represent versatile models to study fundamental aspects of cancer biology [10,11], and the genomic determinants of drug response [3,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study underscored that tissue architecture ensures correct mitotic spindle behaviour. Indeed, 2D cultures of dissociated epithelial cells display mitotic spindle defects opposite to what is observed in cells cultured in a 3D configuration 41 . Human hepatocyte organoids retain cellular polarization, with an apical domain defined by expression of MRP2 and ZO-1, facing the internal bile canaliculus ( Fig.…”
Section: Mitotic Spindle Analyses Reveal An Orchestrated Mode Of Hepamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…6g). These discrepancies could be due to differences in 2D vs 3D culturing of the cells, which has been shown to induce missegregation 41 or alternatively due to mouse-human species differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%