1970
DOI: 10.1126/science.169.3942.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome Pairing: Effect of Colchicine on an Isochromosome

Abstract: Two separable stages in the process of chromosome pairing have been demonstrated. The first results in a close spatial relationship of homologs, and the second results in synapsis and formation of chiasmata. Colchicine reduces chiasma formation in conventional bivalents but not in an isochromosome. Thus, colchicine affects only the first stage of pairing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Driscoll and Darvey (1970) observed that colchicine affects the spatial relationship of homoeologous chromosomes but not the formation of chiasmata. Additionally, they suggested that chromosome position is crucial in the meiotic pairing of homologous and homoeologous chromosomes, altering the arrangement of chromosomes in the nuclear membrane, and allowing the expression of cryptic genomic homology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Driscoll and Darvey (1970) observed that colchicine affects the spatial relationship of homoeologous chromosomes but not the formation of chiasmata. Additionally, they suggested that chromosome position is crucial in the meiotic pairing of homologous and homoeologous chromosomes, altering the arrangement of chromosomes in the nuclear membrane, and allowing the expression of cryptic genomic homology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, the expected alteration of the spatial relation of chromosomes (Driscoll and Darvey 1970) was not observed, hence, they were able to maintain their ordering Avivi 1988, Feldman et al 1997) and anchor to the nuclear membrane (Bass et al 2000, Chikashige et al 2010, favoring pairing among homologous chromosomes. Second, the pam1 gene, which intervenes in the presynaptic mechanisms (Felman andAvivi 1988, Bozza andPawlowski 2008) and in the chromosome reorganization related to the formation of the bouquet (Zickler andKleckner 1998, Bass et al 2000), may have a different effect on Z. diploperennis than on the other Zea species.…”
Section: Cryptic Pairing Among Homoeologous Chromosomes Of the Genus Zeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the link between cytoskeleton and prophase chromosome dynamics in plants had been identified indirectly even before the development of methods for live imaging of meiotic chromosomes. In the 1970s, Driscoll and Darvey showed that colchicine disrupts homologous chromosome pairing (Driscoll and Darvey, 1970). Furthermore, Cowan and Cande demonstrated that colchicine forestalls the bouquet formation .…”
Section: The Role Of Cytoskeleton In Chromosome Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though chromosome movements in maize exhibit similar velocities to chromosome movements in budding yeast, meiotic prophase in maize is several fold-longer (22,29,30), which could be a reflection of the fact that maize chromosomes are much longer than yeast chromosomes and, consequently, require longer time to find their correct pairing partners. Also, colchicine, which stops nuclear motility in maize, has been shown to cause homologous pairing defects in plant meiocytes (31). The nuclear movements during pachynema in maize show different patterns than the zygotene movements, suggesting that they have a different role.…”
Section: Diversity Of Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics Patterns Among Specmentioning
confidence: 99%