2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-008-1270-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome painting shows that skunks (Mephitidae, Carnivora) have highly rearranged karyotypes

Abstract: The karyotypic relationships of skunks (Mephitidae) with other major clades of carnivores are not yet established. Here, multi-directional chromosome painting was used to reveal the karyological relationships among skunks and between Mephitidae (skunks) and Procyonidae (raccoons). Representative species from three genera of Mephitidae (Mephitis mephitis, 2n = 50; Mephitis macroura, 2n = 50; Conepatus leuconotus, 2n = 46; Spilogale gracilis, 2n = 60) and one species of Procyonidae (Procyon lotor, 2n = 38) were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ancestral karyotype of Carnivora has been described or discussed several times [Wurster-Hill and Gray, 1975;Dutrillaux and Couturier, 1983;Fronicke et al, 1997;Murphy et al, 2001b;Nash et al, 2008;Perelman et al, 2008;Nie et al, 2012]. Table 3 provides the correspondence of ACK chromosomes with feline ( Felis catus , FCA), dog ( Canis familiaris , CFA), stone marten ( Martes foina , MFO) and human ( Homo sapiens , HSA) chromosomes as well as with previously suggested ancestral carnivore karyotypes.…”
Section: Ancestral Carnivore Karyotypementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ancestral karyotype of Carnivora has been described or discussed several times [Wurster-Hill and Gray, 1975;Dutrillaux and Couturier, 1983;Fronicke et al, 1997;Murphy et al, 2001b;Nash et al, 2008;Perelman et al, 2008;Nie et al, 2012]. Table 3 provides the correspondence of ACK chromosomes with feline ( Felis catus , FCA), dog ( Canis familiaris , CFA), stone marten ( Martes foina , MFO) and human ( Homo sapiens , HSA) chromosomes as well as with previously suggested ancestral carnivore karyotypes.…”
Section: Ancestral Carnivore Karyotypementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only 2 representatives of Procyonidae, both from the subfamily Procyoninae (Procyon lotor and Bassariscus astutus) , have been studied by chromosome painting [Nash et al, 2008;Perelman et al, 2008]. Their karyotypes differ only by 1 inversion, revealed by dog painting probes (ACK13) [Nie et al, 2012], but otherwise they represent well the ancestral musteloid karyotype (AMK).…”
Section: Procyonidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-bands are localized at the centromeres, but chromosomes 16, 19, and the Y chromosome display large pericentromeric C-bands. The metacentric X-chromosome has a C-positive centromeric region and the Y-chromosome is small and subtelocentric (Perelman et al 2008).…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, chromosome-specific painting probes have been made for nine carnivores: the domestic cat ( Felis catus , FCA) (Wienberg et al , 1997), the domestic dog ( Canis familiaris , CFA) (Breen et al , 1999a; Yang et al , 1999; Graphodatsky et al , 2000a), the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes , VVU) (Yang et al , 1999), the Japanese raccoon dog ( Nyctereutes procyonoides , NPR) (Nash et al , 2001), the American mink ( Mustela vision , MVI) (Graphodatsky et al , 2002), the stone marten ( Martes foina , MFO) (Nie et al , 2002), the giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca , AME) (Nash et al , 1998), the striped skunk ( Mephitis mephitis , MME) and the hooded skunk ( Mephitis macroura , MMA) (Perelman et al , 2008). A series of comparative chromosome maps have been established among carnivores, and karyotypic phylogenetic relationships in different carnivore groups have been revisited by chromosome painting (Nash et al , 1998, 2001, 2008; Graphodatsky et al , 2000a, 2001, 2002, 2008; Nie et al , 2002; Tian et al , 2004; Perelman et al , 2005, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%