2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1924.tb03128.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome Numbers and Dimensions, Species-Formation and Phylogeny in the Genus Carex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to organisms with monocentric chromosomes where acentric fragments are mostly lost during cell division, the breakage of holocentric chromosomes creates fragments with normal centromere activity. Therefore, no lagging anaphase chromosomes and micronuclei occur, and chromosome breakage and translocation events play an important role in the fast karyotype evolution of holocentric species (Heilborn 1924;Brown et al 2004;Kuta et al 2004;Da Silva et al 2008;Hipp et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to organisms with monocentric chromosomes where acentric fragments are mostly lost during cell division, the breakage of holocentric chromosomes creates fragments with normal centromere activity. Therefore, no lagging anaphase chromosomes and micronuclei occur, and chromosome breakage and translocation events play an important role in the fast karyotype evolution of holocentric species (Heilborn 1924;Brown et al 2004;Kuta et al 2004;Da Silva et al 2008;Hipp et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In post-reductional meiosis, this order is reversed (Battaglia & Boyes, 1955). Post-reductional meiosis was first observed in Carex by Heilborn (1928) and demonstrated conclusively by Wahl (1940). Battaglia and Boyes (1955) regrettably did not discuss Carex at length in their seminal review on the topic, apparently because Tanaka (1937Tanaka ( , 1939Tanaka ( , 1940aTanaka ( , b, c, 1941a had reported pre-reductional meiosis from the Cyperaceae.…”
Section: Cytological Characteristics Of the Cyperaceaementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The genus Carex L. exhibits a particularly exceptional aneuploid series, ranging from n=6 to n=66 (Tanaka, 1949), with every number from n=6 to n=47 represented by at least one species (Roalson et al, 2007). Intraspecific variation in Carex is equally remarkable: although chromosome number was initially thought to be invariant within species (Heilborn, 1924;Löve et al, 1957), more than 100 Carex species are known to comprise numerous cytotypes, with some taxa spanning a range of ten haploid (n) chromosomes from highest to lowest count (Wahl, 1940;Tanaka, 1948Tanaka, , 1949Davies, 1956;Cayouette & Morisset, 1986a;Whitkus, 1991;Hoshino, 1992;Rothrock & Reznicek, 1998). Despite an enormous amount of chromosome counting in the Cyperaceae, there are substantial gaps in our knowledge of the pattern and process of chromosome evolution in the genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Carex arenaria L. 60-64 Rohweder, H., 193764 Wulff, H. D., 1937a58 Tanaka, N., 1942c58 Tanaka, N., 194829 Delay, J., 1971 34, 35, 38 Tanaka, N., 1938a34, 38, 42 Okuno, S., 193934, 35, 38 Tanaka, N., 1939b34, 38 Funabiki, K., 1958b16, 18 32, 36 Hoshino, T. & K. Okamoto, 197916-19 32-38 Hoshino, T., 198016-22 32, 34, 36-38 Hoshino, T., 1981a32, 34, 36, 38 Hoshino, T., 198932-34, 36-38 Hoshino, T. & K. Okamura, 1993Heilborn, O., 1939Hindakova, M., 1978 A Synopsis of Chromosome Number Variation in the Cyperaceae irr. 89 Halkka, L., H. -10, 12-13, 18, 20, 24, 26 Hoshino, T., 1981a…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 98%