1954
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401260104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome number and development of progeny of triploid axolotl males crossed with diploid females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…nigromaculata produced some viable spermatozoa (Kawamura, 195 1 ;Kawamura & Tokunaga, 1952). Eggs fertilized with sperm from triploid frogs (Kawamura, 1951) and from axolotls (Fankhauser & Humphrey, 1954) showed good survival in the early stages of development, and this was also seen in embryos from the reciprocal cross between triploid female axolotls mated with diploid males which survived well up to the tailbud stage (Fankhauser & Humphrey, 1950).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nigromaculata produced some viable spermatozoa (Kawamura, 195 1 ;Kawamura & Tokunaga, 1952). Eggs fertilized with sperm from triploid frogs (Kawamura, 1951) and from axolotls (Fankhauser & Humphrey, 1954) showed good survival in the early stages of development, and this was also seen in embryos from the reciprocal cross between triploid female axolotls mated with diploid males which survived well up to the tailbud stage (Fankhauser & Humphrey, 1950).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found sporadically in higher plants (Huskins, 1948) and has been reported as occurring during metamorphosis in the hind gut of the mosquito Culex pipiens (Grell, 1946); in the latter case, cells which have become highly polyploid as the result of endomitosis are brought back to an octoploid or tetraploid state. In his analysis of somatic crossing over in Drosophila, Stern (1936) found no evidence for somatic reduction, nor did Fankhauser & Humphrey (1954) in the axolotl. Two, at least, of the mosaics described above cannot be explained in terms of somatic reduction.…”
Section: Mosaics In Heterozygotesmentioning
confidence: 97%