2015
DOI: 10.7554/elife.05068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis failure in trisomic human cells

Abstract: Cancer cells display aneuploid karyotypes and typically mis-segregate chromosomes at high rates, a phenotype referred to as chromosomal instability (CIN). To test the effects of aneuploidy on chromosome segregation and other mitotic phenotypes we used the colorectal cancer cell line DLD1 (2n = 46) and two variants with trisomy 7 or 13 (DLD1+7 and DLD1+13), as well as euploid and trisomy 13 amniocytes (AF and AF+13). We found that trisomic cells displayed higher rates of chromosome mis-segregation compared to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
17
14
9
5

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
78
32
25
12

Relationship

6
84

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(125 reference statements)
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments found that cells with a single chromosome addition often displayed more subsequent chromosome gains or losses [10]. Moreover, these cells displayed causes and/or characteristics of CIN, such as (ultrafine) anaphase bridges [10], micronuclei [11], chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis failure [12]. Aneuploidy in itself therefore also seems to be a possible ‘gateway’ to increasingly elevated CIN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been developed to model specific whole-chromosome and arm-level aneuploidies, including microcell-mediated chromosome transfer 20 , Cre-lox recombination of homologs to generate acentric and dicentric chromosomes 21 , CRISPR/Cas9-mediated arm-level and wholechromosome deletion 7,22 , and centromere inactivation of chromosome Y by inducible degradation of CENP-A 23 . Although these methods have generated valuable cell lines with particular chromosomal gains and losses 24,25 , all of these approaches rely on clonal expansion, and therefore cells may have evolved during cell culture following the initial karyotype change. Complementary to these targeted studies, others have assessed the short-term consequences of random karyotype changes in human cells predominantly after mitotic checkpoint inhibition [26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneuploid mammalian and yeast cells exhibit proliferation defects (35) and genomic instability (69). In addition, cells harboring whole chromosome gains and losses display metabolic alterations (5,10) and experience proteotoxic stress, which is caused by aneuploidy-induced changes in protein abundance that place an increased demand on the cell’s protein folding and degradation machineries (3,4,1113).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al ( 7 ) cites Nicholson et. al ( 8 ) , traditional citation indices report this citation by displaying the title of the citing paper and other bibliographic information such as the journal, year published, and other metadata ( Figure 1). Traditional citation indices do not have the capacity to examine contextual information or how the citing paper used the citation, such as whether it was made to support or dispute the findings of the cited paper or if it was made in the introduction or the discussion section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneuploidy, mostly of which is monosomy or trisomy, de ned as a chromosome number that is not an exact multiple of the usually haploid number, affects 50%-80% of preimplantation embryos, 10-40% of pregnancies, and 0.3% of newborns [1,2]. It is the leading cause of miscarriages and developmental defects in humans [3,4]. Monosomic or trisomic babies that do survive are associated with well-de ned syndromes, including Turner, Down, Edwards, Patau, Klinefelter, and Superfemale syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observations were made in higher eukaryotes 22 . For example, a comparison between trisomic and diploid human cells has revealed that aneuploid cells are characterized by increased frequency of lagging chromosomes in anaphase 23,24 . Thus, this evidence points at aneuploidy as an instigator of genome instability 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, using CRISPR/Cas9 system, we successfully established a stable line that carries mAID tagged EWSR1 alleles ( AID-EWSR1/AID-EWSR1 ) at a homozygous level in OsTIR1 expressing DLD-1 cells (Hassebroek et al, 2020). The DLD-1 (a colorectal cancer) cell line was utilized in this study because it carries a near-diploid karyotype, and has been utilized as a model cell line to study the induction of aneuploidy (Nicholson et al, 2015, Lengauer et al, 1997b). Here, we show that the knockdown of EWSR1 for one cell cycle is sufficient to induce lagging chromosomes and aneuploidy without inducing mitotic arrest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, using CRISPR/Cas9 system, we successfully established a stable line that is homozygous for mAID tagged EWSR1 alleles ( AID-EWSR1/AID-EWSR1 ) at a homozygous level in OsTIR1 expressing DLD-1 cells ( Hassebroek et al, 2020 ). The DLD-1 (a colorectal cancer) cell line was utilized in this study because it carries a near-diploid karyotype, and has been utilized as a model cell line to study the induction of aneuploidy ( Lengauer et al, 1997 ; Nicholson et al, 2015 ). Here, we show that the knockdown of EWSR1 for 1 cell cycle is sufficient to induce lagging chromosomes and aneuploidy without inducing mitotic arrest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been developed to model specific whole‐chromosome and arm‐level aneuploidies, including microcell‐mediated chromosome transfer (Upender et al , 2004), Cre‐lox recombination of homologs to generate acentric and dicentric chromosomes (Thomas et al , 2018), CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated arm‐level and whole‐chromosome deletion (Adikusuma et al , 2017; Taylor et al , 2018), and centromere inactivation of chromosome Y by inducible degradation of CENP‐A (Ly et al , 2016). Although these methods have generated valuable cell lines with particular chromosomal gains and losses (Nicholson et al , 2015; Passerini et al , 2016), all of these approaches rely on clonal expansion, and therefore cells may have evolved during cell culture following the initial karyotype change. Complementary to these targeted studies, others have assessed the short‐ and longer‐term consequences of random karyotype changes in human cells predominantly after mitotic checkpoint inhibition (Santaguida et al , 2017; Soto et al , 2017; Viganó et al , 2018; Hintzen et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies in yeast (Sheltzer et al 2011, Zhu et al 2012) and more recently in human cells (Nicholson et al 2015, Passerini et al 2016 have shown that the presence of a single extra chromosome appears to be sufficient to initiate further chromosome missegregation events, with mechanisms underlying this beginning to be elucidated. In some cases, aneuploidydriven CIN appears to depend upon deregulated gene expression of specific genes (Nicholson et al 2015), and as such may depend upon the identity of the chromosome in aneuploidy. In another case, a global increase in DNA replication stress was observed, that precipitated further genomic instability (Passerini et al 2016).…”
Section: Mechanisms Driving Chromosomal Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross changes in chromosome number including polyploidy have been shown to deregulate the genome in yeast (Storchova et al 2006) and mammalian (Li et al 1997) systems. In addition, studies in yeast (Sheltzer et al 2011, Zhu et al 2012) and more recently in human cells (Nicholson et al 2015, Passerini et al 2016 have shown that the presence of a single extra chromosome appears to be sufficient to initiate further chromosome missegregation events, with mechanisms underlying this beginning to be elucidated. In some cases, aneuploidydriven CIN appears to depend upon deregulated gene expression of specific genes (Nicholson et al 2015), and as such may depend upon the identity of the chromosome in aneuploidy.…”
Section: Mechanisms Driving Chromosomal Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%