2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05026.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: SummaryThe repair of spontaneous or induced DNA damage by homologous recombination (HR) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae will suppress chromosome rearrangements. Alternative chromosome healing pathways can result in chromosomal instability. One of these pathways is de novo telomere addition where the end of a broken chromosome is stabilized by telomerasedependent addition of telomeres at non-telomeric sites. De novo telomere addition requires the recruitment of telomerase to chromosomal targets. Subsequently, annea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(185 reference statements)
1
86
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The two related helicases Rrm3 and Pif1 have opposing effects on rDNA breakage and recombination via their ability to regulate RFB activity (Ivessa et al 2000). Rrm3 suppresses fork stalling by driving fork progression through non-nucleosomal protein-DNA complexes (Ivessa et al 2003;Torres et al 2004a), whereas Pif1 appears to promote fork arrest, in addition to its role in suppression of de novo telomere addition (Ivessa et al 2000;Pennaneach et al 2006). The synthetic lethal interaction between dia2D and rrm3D suggests that Dia2 and Rrm3 may function redundantly to displace protein-DNA complexes, at least under some circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two related helicases Rrm3 and Pif1 have opposing effects on rDNA breakage and recombination via their ability to regulate RFB activity (Ivessa et al 2000). Rrm3 suppresses fork stalling by driving fork progression through non-nucleosomal protein-DNA complexes (Ivessa et al 2003;Torres et al 2004a), whereas Pif1 appears to promote fork arrest, in addition to its role in suppression of de novo telomere addition (Ivessa et al 2000;Pennaneach et al 2006). The synthetic lethal interaction between dia2D and rrm3D suggests that Dia2 and Rrm3 may function redundantly to displace protein-DNA complexes, at least under some circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCRs include non-reciprocal translocations, chromosome fusions, isoduplications and de novo addition of telomeres. 12 Translocations constitute a minor percentage of GCR events, whereas deletion and loss of genetic material distal to the DSB and subsequent de novo telomere addition is a major contributor to GCRs. In yeast, the telomerase complex consists of Est1p, Est2p (the catalytic component), Est3p, Sm proteins, and the TLC1 RNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PIF1 helicase subfamily appears to perform many cellular functions, ranging from nuclear DNA replication, 15 telomere length regulation, [12][13][14]26,29,30 mitochondrial genome integrity, [7][8][9][10][11]20 DNA repair, [8][9][10] Okazaki fragment processing, 16 assisting the replication fork progress through nonnucleosomal protein-DNA complexes.…”
Section: Disclosure Of Potential Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%