1991
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(91)90203-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome aberrations (CA), sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) and mitogen-induced blastogenesis in cultured peripheral lymphocytes from 48 control individuals sampled 8 times over 2 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Esses achados estão de acordo com os observados por vários autores (Bender et al, 1988;Galloway et al, 1986;Hedner et al, 1982;Margolin & Shelby, 1985), enquanto que outros autores não encontraram nenhum efeito com relação ao sexo (Anderson et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Esses achados estão de acordo com os observados por vários autores (Bender et al, 1988;Galloway et al, 1986;Hedner et al, 1982;Margolin & Shelby, 1985), enquanto que outros autores não encontraram nenhum efeito com relação ao sexo (Anderson et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Similarly, the sex-related differences in mitogeninduced lymphocyte proliferation observed here are in conformity with others. In non-exposed individuals, Anderson et al (1991), observed higher blastogenic transformation in PHA stimulated lymphocytes from women as compared to men. Although Gonsebatt et al 1994 report a greater impairment of lymphocytes in women exposed to arsenic in drinking water as compared to men, they have no measure of dose, which may prove to be higher in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betti et al, 1995) although some studies also observed changes in the levels of chromosomal aberrations, SCEs and DNA adducts in function of the sampling time (e.g. Anderson et al, 1991;Perera et al, 1992;Topinka et al, 1997). This is, most probably, because DNA damage as assessed by the comet assay reflects DNA single-strand breaks and alkali labile sites (eventually also double-strand breaks) which are small, possibly repairable DNA alterations, whereas cytogenetic damage (e.g.…”
Section: Biological Endpoints Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 95%