Chromosome 3 Anomalies Investigated by Genome Wide SNP Analysis of Benign, Low Malignant Potential and Low Grade Ovarian Serous Tumours

Abstract

Ovarian carcinomas exhibit extensive heterogeneity, and their etiology remains unknown. Histological and genetic evidence has led to the proposal that low grade ovarian serous carcinomas (LGOSC) have a different etiology than high grade carcinomas (HGOSC), arising from serous tumours of low malignant potential (LMP). Common regions of chromosome (chr) 3 loss have been observed in all types of serous ovarian tumours, including benign, suggesting that these regions contain genes important in the development of all ovarian serous carcinomas. A high-density genome-wide genotyping bead array technology, which assayed >600,000 markers, was applied to a panel of serous benign and LMP tumours and a small set of LGOSC, to characterize somatic events associated with the most indolent forms of ovarian disease. The genomic patterns inferred were related to TP53, KRAS and BRAF mutations. An increasing frequency of genomic anomalies was observed with pathology of disease: 3/22 (13.6%) benign cases, 40/53 (75.5%) LMP cases and 10/11 (90.9%) LGOSC cases. Low frequencies of chr3 anomalies occurred in all tumour types. Runs of homozygosity were most commonly observed on chr3, with the 3p12-p11 candidate tumour suppressor region the most frequently homozygous region in the genome. An LMP harboured a homozygous deletion on chr6 which created a GOPC-ROS1 fusion gene, previously reported as oncogenic in other cancer types. Somatic TP53, KRAS and BRAF mutations were not observed in benign tumours. KRAS-mutation positive LMP cases displayed significantly more chromosomal aberrations than BRAF-mutation positive or KRAS and BRAF mutation negative cases. Gain of 12p, which harbours the KRAS gene, was particularly evident. A pathology review reclassified all TP53-mutation positive LGOSC cases, some of which acquired a HGOSC status. Taken together, our results support the view that LGOSC could arise from serous benign and LMP tumours, but does not exclude the possibility that HGOSC may derive from LMP tumours.

Feasibility of continuing crizotinib therapy after RECIST-PD in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK/ROS-1 mutations.

“…ALK rearrangements are identified in a minority of NSCLC cases, occurring in 2% to 7% of all NSCLC patients [7,8]. Additionally, ROS1 rearrangement was found in different types of malignant tumors, including NSCLC [9][10][11]. ROS1 gene rearrangements have recently been identified and are observed in 1% to 2% of all lung cancer patients [11,12].…”

PF-06463922 is a potent and selective next-generation ROS1/ALK inhibitor capable of blocking crizotinib-resistant ROS1 mutations

“…However, its function, both in normal physiology and disease, remains poorly defined mainly because of its still unidentified ligand. Chromosomal rearrangements resulting in oncogenic activation of ROS1 have been observed in a subset of patients with glioblastoma (6-9), NSCLC (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), cholangiocarcinoma (15), ovarian cancer (16), angiosarcoma (17), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (18), and Spitzoid melanoma (19). To date, interchromosomal translocations or intrachromosomal deletions have resulted in the production of 20 different N-terminal ROS1 fusion genes in a variety of cancers (Table S1).…”

Foretinib is a potent inhibitor of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins

“…In most cases, ROS1 signaling is activated by interchromosomal translocation or intrachromosomal deletion that results in N-terminal ROS1 fusion genes. Several ROS1 kinase fusion proteins have been identified, including the Fused in Glioblastoma-ROS1 (FIG-ROS) that was first discovered in a human glioblastoma cell line (2) and more recently in patients with NSCLC (4), cholangiocarcinoma (3), and serous ovarian carcinoma (6). The SLC34A2-ROS1 (SLC-ROS) fusion is present in a subset of patients with NSCLC (1, 7) and gastric cancer (8).…”