2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal microarray in unexplained severe early onset epilepsy – A single centre cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number reaches 12.7% when we also consider the possibly pathogenic CNVs. Previous similar studies report a diagnostic yield ranging from ~5% to 12% . Thus, our result fits at the upper limit of this range, probably mainly due to the “epilepsy plus” phenotype of our cohort and to the application of a standardized workflow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This number reaches 12.7% when we also consider the possibly pathogenic CNVs. Previous similar studies report a diagnostic yield ranging from ~5% to 12% . Thus, our result fits at the upper limit of this range, probably mainly due to the “epilepsy plus” phenotype of our cohort and to the application of a standardized workflow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The maximum frequency of pathogenic CNVs reported in any of these series was 12%, with a range of 5%‐12%. These studies tended to focus on individuals who were children at the time of testing . The importance of rare CNVs has been well recognized in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders including unexplained ID, congenital anomalies, and seizures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Targeted testing should be performed in infants in whom a metabolic diagnosis is strongly suspected and in subgroups with higher likelihood of treatable metabolic conditions, such as neonates and parental consanguinity . Although not modeled here, the yield of first‐tier metabolic testing and chromosomal microarray probably warrants their continued use …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%