2006
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.051144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal Fragmentation Is the Major Consequence of the rdgB Defect in Escherichia coli

Abstract: The rdgB mutants depend on recombinational repair of double-strand breaks. To assess other consequences of rdgB inactivation in Escherichia coli, we isolated RdgB-dependent mutants. All transposon inserts making cells dependent on RdgB inactivate genes of double-strand break repair, indicating that chromosomal fragmentation is the major consequence of RdgB inactivation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also lends strong genetic support to the results of physical studies indicating that uracil incorporation and excision cause double-strand breaks in the E. coli chromosome (34,35,37). The number of isolated inserts, together with a similar number from the earlier search for RdgB-dependent mutants (45), also argues against the existence of other, nonessential genes involved in double-strand break repair in E. coli besides recA, recBC, and ruvABC. In fact, the combined density of inserts in these six genes from the two screens is 44 inserts/10,119 bp, or 1 insert per 230 bp, making failure of detection of any but a very small gene unlikely.…”
Section: Vol 190 2008 Dut-dependent Mutants In E Coli 5843supporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This also lends strong genetic support to the results of physical studies indicating that uracil incorporation and excision cause double-strand breaks in the E. coli chromosome (34,35,37). The number of isolated inserts, together with a similar number from the earlier search for RdgB-dependent mutants (45), also argues against the existence of other, nonessential genes involved in double-strand break repair in E. coli besides recA, recBC, and ruvABC. In fact, the combined density of inserts in these six genes from the two screens is 44 inserts/10,119 bp, or 1 insert per 230 bp, making failure of detection of any but a very small gene unlikely.…”
Section: Vol 190 2008 Dut-dependent Mutants In E Coli 5843supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Using pRL27 effectively limits the transposon to a single hop, because the transposase gene is outside of the insertional cassette. Also, our significant collection of the pRL27-induced mutations from this and other projects (10,34,37,45,61) demonstrates that the mutant phenotypes are not limited to complete gene inactivation, but also include polar effects on the downstream genes and antisense effects on the upstream genes. Infrequently, we even encounter inactivation of the regulatory C-terminal domains of proteins, as well as gene overexpression (a particular orientation of the insert in the promoter region).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rather, the main function of RdgB seems to be to prevent Endo V-triggered chromosomal fragmentation (Fig. 8), as suggested by (i) the unviability of rdgB recA, rdgB recBC, and rdgB ruv double mutants (5,9,33); (ii) the significant chromosomal fragmentation in rdgB recBC double mutants (5,25); and (iii) the suppression of both unviability and chromosomal fragmentation by inactivation of Endo V (5; Budke and Kuzminov, unpublished data). It remains to be tested whether the rdgB defect actually increases the amount of dITP and dXTP in the DNA precursor pools and whether the Endo V-recognized modifications in the DNA of rdgB mutants are indeed hypoxanthines and xanthines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%