2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00220.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromium Picolinate Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: An Evidence-Based Review by the United States Food and Drug Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many years, the discussion on the benefit of chromium supplementation was dominated by skepticisms. The FDA has reviewed 29 relevant human studies published through the year 2000 on CrPic 3 as Cr supplement in subjects with risk of type 2 diabetes and found only one small study suggesting that CrPic 3 may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes (Trumbo and Ellwood 2006;Cefalu et al 1999). However, newer publications seem to favour a positive effect of chromium supplementation in diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For many years, the discussion on the benefit of chromium supplementation was dominated by skepticisms. The FDA has reviewed 29 relevant human studies published through the year 2000 on CrPic 3 as Cr supplement in subjects with risk of type 2 diabetes and found only one small study suggesting that CrPic 3 may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes (Trumbo and Ellwood 2006;Cefalu et al 1999). However, newer publications seem to favour a positive effect of chromium supplementation in diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So far, there are still contradictory results from the available meta‐analyses on the value of CrP in reducing IR in diabetic, obese or IGT patients . For instance, a meta‐analysis concluded that chromium effects were non‐relevant after stratifying the studies according to methodological quality, sponsor involvement, and a Western versus non‐Western study location! The latter is not a valid justification for excluding a study from a meta‐analysis, given that gene, lifestyle and population variation all have an impact on the prevalence of PCOS and IR in any population …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,10,25 In a population of subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, the supplementation with either 500 μg or 1000 mg of chromium daily did not produce any significant changes in insulin resistance or glucose tolerance measurements. 26 With so many inconclusive studies showing conflicting evidence, 10,21 and difficulty by some teams in replicating the results of others, no determination was made about chromium picolinate as a component to standard diabetes treatment because of the many variables in the study design, especially differences in populations, different measured markers, and variations in sample size. 26 With so many inconclusive studies showing conflicting evidence, 10,21 and difficulty by some teams in replicating the results of others, no determination was made about chromium picolinate as a component to standard diabetes treatment because of the many variables in the study design, especially differences in populations, different measured markers, and variations in sample size.…”
Section: Diabetes and Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%