2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromium-doped DLC for implants prepared by laser-magnetron deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…%). The same trend was observed in [15]. The higher value of adhesion for pure DLC layers (compared to Baragetti group) can be due to the application of the RF cleaning before the deposition and a further increase was reached by chromium doping.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…%). The same trend was observed in [15]. The higher value of adhesion for pure DLC layers (compared to Baragetti group) can be due to the application of the RF cleaning before the deposition and a further increase was reached by chromium doping.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…AFM showed that the layers were smooth, but with small amounts of random droplets -see Figure 3. Roughness (R a ) were calculated from 10×10 µm area (software NOVA P9) [15]. R a of our layers was measured on Si substrates about 0.2-0.7 nm and on metallic substrates about 1-6 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods therefore vary from posttreatment with ionizing radiation (5,6) to doping with different elements (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). The modification of sole surface areas is also under investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness of doped films was comparable with the roughness of undoped DLC films. With increase of chromium content the roughness was slightly increasing [8] or decreasing [9]. Roughness Ra increased from about 0.62 nm to 1 nm (or decreased from 10 nm to 5 nm].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%